The publisher of a science journal has apologised after a peer reviewer said two female researchers could improve their research by seeking help from “one or two male biologists”.
The review sent to the University of Sussex student read: "It would probably … be beneficial to find one or two male biologists to work with (or at least obtain internal peer review from, but better yet as active co-authors)” to prevent the manuscript from “drifting too far away from empirical evidence into ideologically biased assumptions."
Twitter went into meltdown after evolutionary geneticist Fiona Ingleby shared the review sent to her alongside a rejection letter for her latest research paper.
The writer, whose gender is unknown, went on to claim that it is “not so surprising that on average male doctoral students co-author one more paper than female doctoral students, just as, on average, male doctoral students can probably run a mile a bit faster than female doctoral students.”
Ingleyby told ScienceInsider that she and co—author Megan Head Australian National University in Acton chose not to “name and shame” the journal, as the case highlights wider issues at many publications.
After the RetractionWatch website revealed the journal was published by PLOS, it issued an apology, and said an appeal is in process, adding it regretted the “tone, spirit and content” of the review, according to ScienceMag.org.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies