US government releases previously unseen videos of secret nuclear weapon tests

Scientists say the films have to be digitised because the original footage is decomposing rapidly

Films of nuclear bomb tests from mid-20th century become declassified and accessible

Footage of hundreds of secret nuclear tests carried out during the Cold War has been declassified by the US government for the first time and placed on YouTube.

Between 1945 and 1962, the country carried out 210 nuclear tests in the Mojave desert in Nevada and on several isolated islands in the Pacific.

Concerns about nuclear fallout eventually forced them to carry out the tests either underground or high up in the atmosphere.

But as Cold War tensions rose with the Soviet Union, an arms race developed between the two superpowers as they attempted to build bigger, more deadly weapons.

The American nuclear blasts were filmed on high-speed cameras – which could capture each event at around 2,400 frames per second.

Around 10,000 of these films were sitting idle for around 65 years in a government archive but have now been restored thanks to the efforts of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), a federal research facility in northern California.

Nuclear weapons physicist Greg Spriggs and a team of film experts, archivists and software developers have now uploaded dozens of digital scans of the 750 films which were declassified for the public to view.

Dr Spriggs said they got to the project “just in time” because the films “are on the brink of decomposing to the point where they will become useless”.

The films were not scored properly at the time and are made of nitrate cellulose – which releases a vinegar smell as they degrade. This was apparent to staff when they opened the cans.

He said the first few years of the projects were devoted to simply finding the cans of footage. He estimates they have found 6,500 and scanned 4,200 but only analysed 400 to 500 films.

Nuclear testing was banned by a UN treaty in 1996, though it has not entered into force because it was not ratified by several states including the US.

As a result, the only data they have on high-altitude blasts comes from the 1950s tests.

Dr Spriggs said the data recorded by scientists in the 1950s was not that accurate so they are re-analysing it to create “a set of benchmark data [for use] by future weapons physicists”.

He said: “We found out most of the data which had been published was wrong and we decided we need to rescan and reanalyse all the films.

“We discovered a lot of pieces of information were not analysed in the 50s and we are discovering new things about these detonations we had never even seen before.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in