UK should let in 3.3 million from Hong Kong, says Patten
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHRIS PATTEN, the governor of Hong Kong, provoked anger among Conservative right-wingers yesterday when he called for Britain to give 3.3m residents of the colony the right to live in Britain.
Mr Patten said Britain should give right of abode to all those holding British Dependent Territories passports. In 1990 the Cabinet - of which Mr Patten was then a member - restricted the award of British citizenship to 50,000 heads of households under the British Nationality (Hong Kong) Act.
Yesterday Mr Patten denied that the awarding of passports would prompt a flood of immigrants. Speaking on BBC radio, he said: "I don't think the three million, or more than three million, Hong Kong citizens are suddenly going to arrive at Heathrow. Nobody seriously supposes that, and to be blunt if they did they certainly wouldn't be living on a welfare state." Later, allies of the Governor said he was reflecting the official policy of Government House in Hong Kong, as opposed to that of the British government.
His intervention was welcomed by Claude Moraes, director of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, and by Paddy Ashdown, leader of the Liberal Democrats. But it provoked some anger elsewhere.
Lord Tebbit, who led the campaign against the admission of Hong Kong Chinese in 1990, said: "Three million Chinese would do this economy a power of good. But the point is whether or not there is to be a further breach of the election undertaking that there should be no further large- scale immigration to Britain.
"Chris Patten must have changed his mind as he accepted the Government's view back in 1990. That may be because then he was representing the people of Bath [his former parliamentary constituency], and now he is obviously representing the people of Kowloon."
David Wilshire, MP for Spelthorne, said he was writing to John Major in protest. "It's not acceptable to the British people to let in one more, let alone three million. My response and the response of my constituents is that this country is full up."
A Foreign Office spokesman said nothing has happened to change the conclusion reached in 1990, and Home Office sources also said no changes were planned.
But the Chinese government is likely to react to Mr Patten's remarks with fury. It has already denounced the granting of citizenship to 50,000 residents.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments