Andrew Neil: Ofcom needs to grow a backbone over regulating GB News
The former chairman of the channel said he would not have allowed politicians to present political programmes.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Andrew Neil has said media regulator Ofcom needs to āgrow a backbone and quickā over the issue of politicians hosting TV programmes.
The Spectator chairman, who was founding chairman of GB News and a presenter on the channel before his resignation shortly after the launch, told peers he would never have allowed politicians to present political programmes or interview each other.
Giving evidence to the Lords Communications and Digital Committeeās inquiry into the future of news, he reflected on his eight-night stint on air with the channel, saying it āfelt like eight years at the timeā.
Neil quit the channel after differences over the direction in which it was heading, saying he felt he was in a āminority of oneā about its future.
Questioned about the issue of due impartiality, Neil told peers: āIām surprised at how tolerant Ofcom has been of GB News.
āIt may be because the rest of the broadcast universe is on the centre, centre-left so it gave GB news a bit more leeway to settle down.
āI am surprised that any regulator would allow politicians sitting in the Houses of Parliament to present political TV programmes.
āIf I had stayed as chairman it would not have happened because I would not have had any politician present a TV show in the first place, and I would certainly never have allowed politicians to interview politicians from the same party.
āI just find that incredible and I think on these areas Ofcom needs to find a backbone and quick.ā
Last month, episodes of GB News programmes presented by Conservative MPs were found to have broken broadcasting rules by them acting as newsreaders.
Ofcomās probe involved shows that were presented by former House of Commons leader Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, as well as minister without portfolio Esther McVey and backbencher Philip Davies, and the channel was warned about potential sanctions if there are further breaches.
Married couple Ms McVey and Mr Davies are no longer part of the GB News line-up.
Asked how GB News would have been different if his views had been listened to, Neil said: āIt would have been different in two ways: the production values would have been very different, it wouldnāt have looked like it was coming from a nuclear bunker of the president of North Korea.
āIt would have been modern, high-quality production values.
āIt would have merely tried to change the focus of a hinterland from which you covered stories;Ā it was not an attempt to bring a Fox News to Britain ā I think that would be bad for Britain and I donāt think there is a market for it.ā
A spokeswoman for GB News said: āGB News does not comment on former staff.ā
An Ofcom spokeswoman said: āWe donāt recognise this characterisation of our approach, given weāve found GB News in breach of our rules 11 times.
āWeāll shortly publish new research into what viewers and listeners think about politicians presenting programmes.ā
In June 2023, Ofcom announced that it is carrying out āaudience research regarding politicians presenting programmesā via a research agency.