Drink-drive judgment reserved

Thursday 08 October 1992 23:02 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three High Court judges reserved judgment on whether thousands of motorists could be entitled to have their convictions for failing to provide breath, blood or urine samples for analysis under the drink- drive laws quashed because of a legal loophole.

Lord Justice Watkins, sitting with Mr Justice Macpherson and Mr Justice Roch, said at the end of a two-day test case hearing that they hoped to give their decision very soon.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Thank you for registering

Drink-drive judgment reserved

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering