Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

36,000 bottles of eye drops recalled after printer ink is found inside

 

James Legge
Thursday 03 January 2013 18:36 GMT
Comments
Almost 36,000 bottles of prescription eye drops need to be sent back to their manufacturer
Almost 36,000 bottles of prescription eye drops need to be sent back to their manufacturer (Rex Features)

Almost 36,000 bottles of prescription eye drops need to be sent back to their manufacturer, after they were found to contain printing ink.

Bausch and Lomb, the maker of the drops, has sent letters to doctors and chemists ordering the return of 1,780 batches, each containing 20 bottles of the solution, which is used as a local anaesthetic for eye procedures in hospitals.

A spokeswoman for the company said: “Bausch and Lomb is conducting a voluntary recall of a single lot of proxymetacaine 0.5 per cent Minims Eye Drops Solution.

“We chose to initiate this recall after confirming a report of the presence of foreign particles in a product from this single lot.

“No other products in the Minims range or other Bausch and Lomb products are affected by this action.”

There is so far no evidence of injury to users as a result of the blunder.

In a letter to hospitals and pharmacies, Irene Fazakerley, from the Scottish Government's health department, said: “Bausch and Lomb is recalling the batch because black particles have been identified in some packs.

“Initial investigations suggest that the contaminant is printing ink, in which case we understand that the risk of toxicity is low.

“No other batches of this or any other product are affected.

“Healthcare professionals are asked to quarantine remaining stock and contact the wholesaler from which it was obtained to arrange uplift and replacement.”

A spokesman from the drug watchdog, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said: “These eye drops are only used in hospitals and administered by medical professionals.

“We don't anticipate that people will have them at home.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in