'An untrusting and suspicious person': Lord Sugar tells tribunal his side of the story about Apprentice winner Stella English

 

Stella English with Lord Sugar after becoming the Apprentice winner in 2010
Stella English with Lord Sugar after becoming the Apprentice winner in 2010

The former Apprentice winner suing Lord Sugar for constructive dismissal was an “untrusting and suspicious person,” the millionaire business mogul has claimed.

Lord Sugar told an employment tribunal that he was surprised when Stella English, who triumphed on the BBC One show in 2010, told him she was not enjoying her £100,000 role in his company.

“I began to think that perhaps the reality of work rather than the glamour of showbusiness was beginning to bite with her,” he said. “Her time in the limelight was beginning to fade.”

Ms English, 34, told the tribunal today that she was informed in a meeting with Lord Sugar in September 2011 that he would not be keeping her on at his set-top box company YouView.

She claimed: "He said to me 'Look, if you think Lord Sugar is shitting himself and that's why you're here, that's where you're mistaken - I don't give a shit,’” she said. “’I've met my obligations to you. I did it for the BBC and the integrity of the show and a bit of my own PR and a bit of yours too. But the fact is that I don't give a shit.’

“At this point I thought we were living in the real world, not in a game show.”

But Lord Sugar said his former employee was fond of “odd conspiracy theories”.

“It was clear to me now that she thought that everyone was out to trick her,” he said. “She thought during the whole process that she was being lied to and that the other candidate has been chosen as the winner.” Ms English apparently confronted Lord Sugar after she believed rival contestant Chris Bates had won because she had not filmed a segment leaving his office in a chauffeur-driven car.

Ms English claimed yesterday that she felt like an “overpaid lackey” in a “sham” administrative position in her role at Viglen, her first job with Lord Sugar before she was transferred to YouView. Lord Sugar contended the idea she had told him this in person. “That bit is a complete reconstruction or better described as a figment of her imagination,” he said.

He also denied that Viglen chief executive Bordan Tkachuk replied: "Nice girl. Don't do a lot" when he asked what he thought of her during a meeting between them. “This is typical of her struggling to deal with the truth or facts,” he said.

Lord Sugar will continue to read his statement and give evidence at the tribunal tomorrow.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in