Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Baby whose father lives in 'complicated' situation with two women is put up for adoption

Psychologist who assessed the family said the relationship was 'not good' for a child

Maya Oppenheim
Wednesday 27 June 2018 12:13 BST
Comments
Judge Lynch concluded the baby should be placed for adoption saying his parents could not meet his needs
Judge Lynch concluded the baby should be placed for adoption saying his parents could not meet his needs (Getty)

A family court judge has ruled a baby whose father lives in a "complicated" relationship with two women should be put up for adoption.

Judge Sarah Lynch was told the man was living with the little boy's mother and "another woman".

A psychologist who assessed the family said the relationship was "not good" for a child.

The relationship was one of a number of concerns raised by council social workers with welfare responsibility for the youngster.

They also said the baby – who is a few months old – was living in a flat which was "unhygienic and inappropriate".

The baby's parents had agreed they could not bring up their son.

Judge Lynch concluded the baby should be placed for adoption – saying his parents could not meet his needs.

"The psychologist felt there were a lot of complicated things in the relationship between the three grown-ups which would not be good for a child," said the judge.

"Overall, she said she would have a lot of worries about the parents' ability to meet (the baby's) needs either together or separately."

She added: "Father... says he knows he cannot give (his son) what he would need from a parent. Mother too says that she thinks it would be best for (the baby) if he was adopted."

The judge, who is based in Leeds, has outlined her decision in a written ruling following a private family court hearing.

She said the little boy could not be identified.

Judge Lynch said the man had an older child born following a relationship with a third woman.

That child had also been taken from his care in the wake of an earlier ruling by a different family court judge.

Judge Lynch said in that case social workers had also raised a number of concerns.

One concern included the fact the child had been fed ice cream when "only" 15 weeks old.

Additional reporting by Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in