Defence chiefs ‘funding slaughter of bears’ with £1m fur hat spend

Pamela Anderson tells Boris Johnson it would be ‘unconscionable’ not to accept offer of free faux skins

Jane Dalton
Friday 19 November 2021 15:43
Comments
<p>A fake-fur ‘bear’ at Downing Street in an appeal to the PM </p>

A fake-fur ‘bear’ at Downing Street in an appeal to the PM

The government spent more than £1m of taxpayer money in seven years on bear fur hats for the military, official figures show.

From 2014 to 2019, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) bought a total of 891 caps for the Queen’s Guard, according to data given to animal-rights organisation Peta, which said up to 1,000 bear could have died in the process of making the hats.

Ceremonial bearskin hats are made from the skins of Canadian black bears, which are often suffer slow deaths after being shot, Peta says. It claims at least one bear is killed for each hat made – or more if a mother with cubs is targeted.

The MoD purchases cost £1,076,149 in total over the seven years.

The department told Peta that last year it bought 110 bearskin caps at a cost of £145,000. Previous purchases, according to Freedom of Information Act replies, were:

  • 2019: 92 caps, costing £127,440
  • 2018: 61 caps, costing £76,206
  • 2017: 172 caps, costing £201,071
  • 2016: 207 caps, costing £240,382
  • 2015: 122 caps, costing £149,379
  • 2014: 127 caps, costing £136,671

Actor Pamela Anderson has written to Boris Johnson urging him to replace the bearskin caps after a faux-fur company based in France, Ecopel, offered to provide the MoD with artificial bear fur free of charge until 2030.

“[It’s] outrageous that the caps worn by the Queen’s Guard – a British icon – are still made from the fur of bears who are killed in my native Canada,” she wrote.

“Please instruct the Ministry of Defence to make the switch to cruelty-free faux fur. Peta and Ecopel have provided the solution. It would be unconscionable not to take it.”

As mayor of London six years ago, Boris Johnson said he would be open to using fake fur hats if it might “help save a few bears”, according to The Telegraph.

During black bear hunts, up to one in seven escapes wounded and dies slowly from blood loss or starvation, Peta says.

And if a nursing mother bear is killed, entire families die because the cubs cannot fend for themselves.

Designer Stella McCartney has previously offered to create new faux fur hats for the MoD, but it’s believed her offer was declined.

Peta senior campaigns manager Kate Werner said: “There is no excuse for the Ministry of Defence to continue funding the slaughter of black bears – and the prime minister must put a stop to it.

“The humane, high-performing faux fur created by Ecopel gives a nod to tradition while preventing sensitive bears from being viciously slaughtered for their fur.”

The organisation sent a person in dressed as a bear in the faux skin to Downing Street to call on the prime minister to make the switch.

Ecopel says its fabric looks and functions exactly like real bearskin. The artificial material offered matches the exact length of real bear fur and is easily rendered 100 per cent waterproof, the designers say.

An Army spokesperson said: “The bearskins worn by the Guards are part of our proud military history and identity. There are no suitable alternatives.

“These bearskins, like leather, horn and sheepskin are by-products of other purposes and should not be confused with fur farming.

“Guards’ bearskins are sourced from the by-product of a necessary cull of black bears in Canada. The bears are not bred for the purpose of fur.”

Bearskins are worn by the five regiments of Foot Guards: Grenadiers, Coldstream, Scots, Irish and Welsh. The Royal Scots Dragoon Guards, Fusilier Regiments and the Infantry part of the Honourable Artillery Company wear a full-sized bearskin cap in full dress.

Buying real animal fur is still legal in the UK, even though the government has come under intense pressure to outlaw imports as fur farms are banned in Britain.

Earlier this year ministers launched a call for evidence on the implications of a block on importing and selling real fur.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in