British Army not scrapping all tanks in defence review, Ben Wallace insists
The UK maintains some 227 Challenger 2 main battle tanks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK will not scrap all its tanks in its drive to modernise the armed forces, the defence secretary has said.
Ben Wallace was responding to reports that said Britain would no longer deploy tanks because of high maintenance costs and pressure on defence spending.
The British Army has some 227 Challenger 2 main battle tanks.
Mr Wallace told the BBC: "We're going to make sure we have an armed forces fit for the 21st Century and meets our obligations to Nato and elsewhere.
"We are not scrapping all the British army's tanks and we will make sure the ones we maintain are up to date, lethal and defendable."
The government is conducting a major review of the country’s defence capability and future plans, billed as the most comprehensive since the Cold War.
In the summer, MPs raised concerns that the process was not transparent enough, saying it was not even clear who was directing it.
“The Defence Committee, alongside colleagues in the Foreign Affairs and International Development Committees, have repeatedly called for clarity and transparency from the government," said Tobias Ellwood in August.
“These calls have, at times, been left unanswered. A number of unknowns remain, including the key players at the heart of the review. A policy review of this importance should not take place behind closed doors.”
The review is due to be published this year.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.