Covid: Former MI6 chief says any Wuhan lab leak evidence has likely been destroyed

Scientists remain divided over the lab leak theory – but former UK intelligence boss Sir Richard Dearlove thinks virus ‘far more likely’ to have come from research facility than an animal

Adam Forrest
Thursday 03 June 2021 18:28
Comments
Coronavirus in numbers

Any evidence of a lab leak that may have caused the Covid-19 pandemic would likely have been destroyed by Chinese officials by now, a former MI6 chief has claimed.

Sir Richard Dearlove said it would now be difficult to prove that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was working on “gain of function” experiments to make a novel coronavirus.

“We don’t know that’s what’s happened – but a lot of data have probably been destroyed or made to disappear so it’s going to be difficult to prove definitely the case for a ‘gain of function chimera’ being the cause of the pandemic,” he said.

The scientific community remains divided over how plausible it is that the virus began with a research lab leak, but president Joe Biden’s call for more US investigations into the origins of Covid-19 has rekindled interest in the theory.

Sir Richard told The Daily Telegraph’s Planet Normal podcast that he felt some vindication now that more people were beginning to take seriously his own repeated questioning of the virus’ origin.

The former intelligence chief, head of the UK’s spy agency between 1999 and 2004, has previously said the novel coronavirus is “far more likely” to have come from a lab than an animal.

Sir Richard told the podcast it was possible Chinese scientists who wanted to speak out about experiments had been “silenced”.

“The People’s Republic of China is a pretty terrifying regime and does some things we consider unacceptable and extreme in silencing opposition to the official line of the government,” he said.

Sir Richard also said western countries had been naive in trusting China – claiming the country had infiltrated scientific institutions and journals in the UK and elsewhere.

He spoke of the “extraordinary behaviour” in the scientific community, which had shut down any debate, something he said verged on “academic bullying”.

Sir Richard Dearlove

The former intelligence chief also said China had originally been “let off the hook” in regard to questions about the virus’s origins, due to scepticism over Donald Trump and his administration, which had led such enquiries initially.

But after the Biden administration’s request for more US intelligence investigations, and as British intelligence assists in probing a possible lab leak, Sir Richard claimed the “whole argument” had now shifted.

While some scientists have called for further investigation into the origins of the virus, many remain sceptical of the lab leak theory.

Robert F Garry – a virologist at Tulane University who analysed the genome sequence of the novel coronavirus – has told The Independent he doubts that the pandemic could have emerged from a laboratory.

He said it was “extremely unlikely” the pandemic came from a lab leak, adding: “There are numerous hypotheses that fall under lab leak – they vary from not credible at all to barely credible.”

An aerial shot of the Wuhan Institute of Virology

Sir Richard also castigated British political leaders, including former prime minister David Cameron, for “sheer naivety” in placing too much trust in China.

“Some of the things that were said by George Osborne and David Cameron about our relationship with China – how we were going to have this privileged position – I was staggered at the time by the sheer naivety.”

Sir Richard also said the World Health Organisation (WHO) was “a lost cause” and should not be left by itself to look rigorously into the origins of the virus to provide “a clear understanding of what the hell happened”.

A team of experts from WHO and China said in February that the virus was “extremely unlikely” to have entered the population through a laboratory-related incident, and was instead probably transmitted from bats to humans through another animal.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in