Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David & Frederick Barclay

A Statement

Tuesday 30 November 1999 00:00 GMT
Comments

We published an article in November about David and Frederick Barclays' ownership of the Channel Island of Brecqhou and their part in getting Sark's feudal laws of succession changed as being contrary to the European Convention of Human Rights.

We published an article in November about David and Frederick Barclays' ownership of the Channel Island of Brecqhou and their part in getting Sark's feudal laws of succession changed as being contrary to the European Convention of Human Rights.

The Barclays have told us that it has never been their intention unilaterally to declare Brecqhou independent. The article reported public criticism made about the Seigneur of Sark by the Barclays and the Seigneur's response. In doing so no endorsement of either parties' position was intended.

We understand that the words of an elderly Sark resident, quoted in the article, could have been taken to suggest that the Barclays present a greater threat to Sark than the German occupation during the war.

We are happy to make it clear that no such suggestion was intended, and we apologise for any distress caused to David and Frederick Barclay.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in