Doctor claims he was dismissed for whistle-blowing over child protection

 

Nina Lakhani
Thursday 05 April 2012 17:58
Comments

A senior paediatrician who was sacked by a West Midlands hospital for alleged “gross misconduct and insubordination” claims he lost his job for blowing the whistle about child protection issues, an employment tribunal has heard.

David Drew, 64, was sacked by Walsall Manor Hospital in December 2010 for creating a “toxic environment” amid allegations by management that he was mentally unstable and plaguing colleagues with unwanted religious messages.

Dr Drew, a respected paediatrician with a 37-year unblemished career and a practising Christian, had repeatedly raised the alarm about the dangers of a broken heating system, staffing cuts and bullying managers on child safety.

The Birmingham employment tribunal has heard evidence that the problems started when Dr Drew, who was clinical director at the time, raised concerns about a consultant who allowed a child with suspicious injuries to go home despite warnings from other staff. The toddler, Kyle Keen, was later killed by his abusive step-father, Tyrone Matthews, who was jailed for manslaughter in 2007.

Dr Drew said he told senior managers that recommendations by the subsequent inquiry into the child’s death were not being taken seriously.

Dr Drew also repeated concerns about sick children being cared for in freezing wards during the winter of 2008/09, and that children were forced to share toilet facilities with adults on an unsupervised ward, despite earlier incidents of alleged child abuse. He also raised concerns about cutting paediatric nurses and doctors in order to meet savings required for foundation trust status.

Dr Drew told the tribunal that the chief executive, Sue James, had failed to adequately deal with these serious incidents.

Dr Drew was first suspended in 2009 for six weeks following a complaint by a senior nurse that he was undermining her, but which was subsequently dismissed as unfounded. It was after that, vague allegations about mental illness and inappropriate religious behaviour – which centre on Dr Drew emailing colleagues the Prayer of St Ignatius – were first made.

A grievance by Dr Drew about his suspension was dealt with by an independent review panel. He was told to accept carte blanch the recommendations “for the greater good of the department” which included refraining from making any reference to religion in professional communications. In June 2010 he was offered a “generous” severance package as long he signed a gagging clause and left quickly and quietly. He refused.

He was sacked in December 2010 after what he says was a fundamentally flawed disciplinary investigation, for refusing to accept the recommendation about communicating religious beliefs. The chief executive rejected an assertion by Dr Drew’s lawyers that she had simply “shot the messenger” of bad news.

The trust told the tribunal that Dr Drew was an excellent clinician and a good leader, but that there had been a complete breakdown in trust and confidence.

Drew is claiming unfair dismissal on the grounds of victimisation and religious discrimination, but told The Independent: “My profound belief is that I was sacked for raising serious concerns. The trust used the prayer as a lever to get rid of me.”

In summing up Eleena Misra, counsel for the trust, said: “There is no evidence to support the claim that the claimant was targeted for being a Christian rather than being subject to a recommendation that related to his communication style which included religious references.”

She added: “She [the chief executive] needed everyone in the department to accept the recommendations including Dr Drew ... therefore it was understandable that he was referred to a disciplinary panel.”

The judgement is expected in the next few weeks.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in