Drone believed to have hit British Airways plane 'could have been plastic bag’

Minister for Transport told Parliament we should ‘not overreact too much’

Hungarian authorities reportedly issued their highest alert and the pair of fighter jets were sent to identify the aircraft and ensure it was making safe progress
Hungarian authorities reportedly issued their highest alert and the pair of fighter jets were sent to identify the aircraft and ensure it was making safe progress

The suspected “drone” which struck a British Airways plane over London on Sunday could have been a “plastic bag”, according to Transport minister Richard Goodwill.

Mr Goodwill warned against “overreacting” after a pilot reported an object, which he believed to be a drone, had struck the front of an Airbus A320 as it flew over the Richmond area of London.

Both the Metropolitan Police and the Air Accident’s Investigations Branch have been investigating the incident, which took place on Sunday, but no evidence has been found to suggest a drone was involved.

Mr Goodwill told a House of Lords committee early reports of a dent in the front of the plane "were not confirmed".

“The reported drone strike on Sunday has not been confirmed it was actually a drone," he said. "It was the local police force that tweeted that they had a report of a drone striking an aircraft.

“There was no actual damage to the plane and there's indeed some speculation that it may have even been a plastic bag or something."

Mr Goodwill admitted that while he had not actually landed a 747 at Heathrow, he had "landed the simulator and the pilot has a lot of other things to concentrate on".

"We're not quite sure what they saw so I think we should maybe not overreact too much,” he added.

However, a spokesperson from the British Airline Pilots Association (BALPA) - which is due to meet the Secretary of State regarding the issue - warned of the "growing risk" of drones near airports and said it would be advisable to listen to the pilots who witnessed the incident in the first place.

“The best people to comment on what they saw are the pilots in the cockpit and the UK Airprox Board who study such events, rather than officials in Horseferry Road."

Richard Taylor, of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), said they believe the laws in place governing the use of drones are “proportionate to the current level of risk”.

Presently, for ‘small unmanned aircraft’ – which includes drones under 20kg - there are regulations restricting where the aircraft is flown, and it is the ‘remote pilot’s’ responsibility to ensure nothing is endangered by the drone, and they can see it at all times. Should a person wish to go beyond these parameters, or if they are paid for their aerial work, they must be approved by the CAA.

“Recreational drone users have an obligation to abide by the law. Anyone who breaches these laws can face arrest and prosecution. The police now enforce the laws relating to drones,” said Mr Taylor.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in