Greenpeace makes legal bid to stop UK offshore drilling

Pa
Friday 12 November 2010 14:16
Comments

Greenpeace has launched legal action in a bid to stop UK offshore drilling in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

The environmental group announced today that its lawyers have filed a claim at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

They are to seek court orders banning the issuing of new licences for deep-sea drilling until the causes of the Deepwater Horizon explosion have been properly established.

Greenpeace says that, if its legal challenge is successful, its action will affect over 20 oil production licences and could halt future licensing rounds.

Greenpeace lawyers argue the ban is necessary because the licences relate to areas close to environmentally-sensitive sites which support species such as whales and dolphins and are legally protected.

They will seek to persuade a judge that, in the wake of the recent BP disaster, the Government cannot be certain that drilling in those areas will not result in environmental damage.

They want a ruling that licences should not be handed out until a proper assessment, as required by law, has taken place.

Today, papers were lodged at the High Court applying for permission to seek judicial review, and these will now go before a single judge sitting in private.

The judge will decide whether Greenpeace has an "arguable case" which should go to a full hearing.

Greenpeace says just a few weeks ago Chevron admitted that drilling in the deep waters off Shetland could cause a spill "worse than the Gulf of Mexico disaster".

The group boasts that it has a strong record of success in the courts and won a similar battle on oil production licences in 1999.

Legal challenges to nuclear power and the third Heathrow runway have also been successful in recent years.

John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace, said: "The Government is handing out oil drilling licences left, right and centre as if the Deepwater Horizon disaster never happened. And they've got to stop.

"The oil industry is drilling in riskier and more dangerous places in UK waters, where a spill could be a disaster for wildlife."

The "addiction to oil" was also seriously undermining the fight against climate change.

"Long-term energy security must come from lowering demand through efficiency savings, not scraping the bottom of the oil barrel in fragile habitats and treacherous seas like those west of Shetland," said Mr Sauven.

BP has said that the Deepwater Horizon incident will cost the company at least 40 billion (£24,792,700).

Greenpeace says any clean-up operation off Shetland could be severely hampered by rough weather, making it more expensive and difficult than the operation in the US.

Colder waters would also mean that oil would disperse much more slowly and cause potentially greater damage to wildlife, like whales and dolphins.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in