Factory owned by Grenfell Tower cladding manufacturers hit by fire

Blaze broke out in early hours at a plant owned by Arconic, who produce cladding panel

Jack Hardy
Saturday 04 November 2017 18:41
Comments
Arconic stopped international sales of Reynobond PE cladding, which was used in Grenfell, for tall buildings, citing concerns about inconsistent global building codes
Arconic stopped international sales of Reynobond PE cladding, which was used in Grenfell, for tall buildings, citing concerns about inconsistent global building codes

A factory owned by the makers of Grenfell Tower‘s cladding panels has caught fire. Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service was called to the production plant of Arconic in Exeter just before 1.30am on Saturday.

The US firm produces the Reynobond PE panels, used as one component of the west London block’s cladding system during a refurbishment.

It is suspected that the material, which has a plastic, flammable core, helped fuel the blaze in June.

Fire crews called eight fire engines to fight the blaze along with support vehicles. The fire service said: “Due to the potentially serious nature of this incident and knowledge of the type of building involved, fire control made the decision to redirect fire appliances from other lower priority incidents in the area to ensure fire service resources were in attendance as soon as possible.”

The blaze spread to the roof, but eventually firefighters used breathing apparatus to bring the fire under control and extinguished it before 3am. Despite damage to the property, no one was injured in the fire, which the fire service said was started accidentally.

In June, Arconic stopped international sales of Reynobond PE cladding, which was used in Grenfell, for tall buildings. They cited concerns about the “inconsistency of building codes across the world”.

It said in a separate statement that the panels were provided by an installer working on behalf of the contractor for Grenfell Tower.

The company said: “We were not involved in the installation of the system, nor did we have a role in any other aspect of the building’s refurbishment or original design.”

Press Association

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in