Heathrow Airport expansion: UK business responds furiously as decision on third runway is delayed until summer 2016

Government defers any decision about where to build extra aviation capacity until after London Mayoral elections in May

Simon Calder
Travel Correspondent
Thursday 10 December 2015 20:18
Comments
An aerial view of Heathrow. London will set a new global record for the number of passengers flying in and out of a single city this year, with the total exceeding 150m for the first time
An aerial view of Heathrow. London will set a new global record for the number of passengers flying in and out of a single city this year, with the total exceeding 150m for the first time

As local politics once again supplant the national debate about international connectivity, UK business has responded furiously to a further delay in assigning a new runway for London.

The Government has deferred any decision about where to build extra aviation capacity until after the London Mayoral elections in May 2016 - by which time two-runway Heathrow will have celebrated its 70th birthday.

In 2012 David Cameron set up the Airports Commission, chaired by Sir Howard Davies, to recommend the best solution to South-east England’s capacity crunch.

Boris on Heathrow expansion

Two years ago, Sir Howard narrowed the choice to two Heathrow options - a third runway or an extended northern runway - or a second runway at Gatwick.

Last July, the Davies Commission recommended a third runway at Heathrow, with “a comprehensive package of accompanying measures which would make the airport’s expansion more acceptable to its local community”.

On the same day, the Transport Secretary, Patrick McLoughlin, said: “We will come back to Parliament in the autumn to provide clear direction on the government’s plans.”

But he insisted more time was needed, saying: “It’s vitally important we get the decision right so that it will benefit generations to come. We will undertake more work on environmental impacts, including air quality, noise and carbon.”

No decision is expected for six months, by which time the new London Mayor will be known. The Tory candidate, Zak Goldsmith, had vowed to resign as MP for Richmond Park if a third runway at Heathrow goes ahead.

Chickens wander around within the 'Grow Heathrow' protest camp, in Sipson, near Heathrow airport . 

The CBI Director-General, Carolyn Fairbairn, called the postponement "deeply disappointing", and said: "The Airports Commission spent three years analysing impartial evidence, at a cost of £20 million. We cannot fall into the habit of simply commissioning new evidence, instead of the Government taking the tough decisions needed at the end of the process."

Gavin Hayes, Director of Let Britain Fly, said: "The Prime Minister has yet again decided to put short-term political interests before the long-term national interest and kicked the can down the road for another six months.

Heathrow is already the UK's busiest airport

"This latest fudge is all about political expediency, not about doing what is right for our economy."

Campaigners against expansion at Heathrow claimed the move showed a third runway is undeliverable. John Stewart, chair of HACAN, said: "The Government should face up to the reality that a third runway is unlikely ever to see the light of day."

The Transport Secretary’s announcement was welcomed by Gatwick’s chief executive. Stewart Wingate said: "There is now a clear choice facing Britain: growth with Gatwick or inertia at Heathrow with an illegal scheme that has failed time and time again. Expansion at Gatwick would give the country the economic benefit it needs at a dramatically lower environmental cost."

An artist's impression showing how Heathrow Airport could look with a third runway

This year London will set a new global record for the number of passengers flying in and out of a single city. The total will exceed 150m for the first time, way ahead of its nearest rival, New York. But no new full-length runway has been built since Heathrow opened in January 1946.

The announcement moves the airport debate back to where it was a quarter-century ago. In 1990, the Conservative Government set up a study into "Runway Capacity to Serve the South East". Three years later, it concluded that "Benefits to passengers would justify a further runway at Heathrow or Gatwick by 2010" so long as surface access to airports and improved public transport links were properly examined.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in