Government claims that rough sleeping rates are falling cannot be trusted, says UK statistics chief

Current statistics ‘should not be used to draw firm conclusions’ or support claims about success of government’s emergency funding scheme to tackle rough sleeping, says Sir David Norgrove

May Bulman
Social Affairs Correspondent
Friday 19 April 2019 23:55
Comments
The UK Statistics Authority chair raised concerns that some councils that received funding under the Rough Sleeping Initiative (RSI) may have deliberately underreported the scale of the crisis in their area
The UK Statistics Authority chair raised concerns that some councils that received funding under the Rough Sleeping Initiative (RSI) may have deliberately underreported the scale of the crisis in their area

Government claims that rough sleeping rates in England are falling cannot be trusted because they are based on unreliable figures, the UK’s statistics chief has warned.

Sir David Norgrove said an “apparent methodological change” in the way local authorities record rough sleeping meant the statistics “should not be used to draw firm conclusions” or to support claims about the success of the government’s emergency funding scheme to tackle the issue.

In a letter to Tory peer Lord Bourne, Sir David raised concerns that some councils that received funding under the Rough Sleeping Initiative (RSI) – which has given £30m to local authorities with high levels of rough sleeping – may have deliberately underreported the scale of the crisis in their area.

During a Lords debate on rough sleeping on 1 April, communities secretary James Brokenshire said the number of rough sleepers in England had decreased by 19 per cent in areas receiving funding as part of the initiative between 2017 and 2018.

In January, official figures showed the overall number of people sleeping on the street on a “snapshot night in autumn” had dropped to 4,677 from 4,751 the year before.

But charities warned at the time that the count was an “unreliable” source that “significantly underestimated” the number of people experiencing the devastation of sleeping rough. This claim was supported when a number of shelters contacted by The Independent all reported record levels of demand as temperatures in parts of the country dropped as low as -14C.

Now, in a significant intervention, Sir David said the latest rough sleeping statistics “could not yet support” public claims about the success of the RSI.

He identified that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) “could have done more” to acknowledge and explore a “significant change” in the way many local authorities record the number of people sleeping rough in their areas.

“We currently await greater clarity from MHCLG about what is driving this change in approach, its relationship to RSI funding, and the extent to which it may have affected the comparability of the series,” he said in the letter.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

“Until MHCLG provide greater clarity, we believe MHCLG’s latest rough sleeping statistics should not be used to draw firm conclusions about recent trends in rough sleeping and cannot yet support public claims about the success of the RSI.”

It comes after councils were accused of adopting a “form of social cleansing” after it emerged there had been an 89 per cent rise in Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs), which criminalise acts such as rough sleeping and begging, in the last three years.

An MHCLG spokesperson said: “In areas where the Government has targeted funding and interventions through its Rough Sleeping Initiative, the number of rough sleepers has fallen by 19 per cent as compared to the national decrease of two per cent. The Rough Sleeping Initiative funds local authorities to provide specialist services to help the most vulnerable people in society off the streets. We will publish an evaluation later this year which will help to understand the impact of the initiative.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in