Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour MPs accused of using ChatGPT to write speeches

A Tory MP said some Labour backbenchers were using the chatbot because their specches included American phrases

Rhiannon James
Tuesday 09 September 2025 19:01 BST
OpenAI launches GPT-5, its first flagship update to ChatGPT model in years

Labour MPs have been accused of using artificial intelligence to write their parliamentary speeches.

Tom Tugendhat, a Conservative MP and former government minister, said members on the opposite benches were clearly using a chatbot because their contributions included phrases such as, “I rise to speak”.

Speaking in the Commons, the Tonbridge MP said: “On the other side, all we’re hearing is the ChatGPT generated press releases.

“I rise to speak. I rise to speak. I rise to speak. ChatGPT knows you’re there, but that is an Americanism that we don’t use, but still, keep using it, because it makes it clear that this place has become absurd.”

Tom Tugendhat made the claims on Tuesday
Tom Tugendhat made the claims on Tuesday (Jacob King/PA)

Mr Tugendhat also joked that Labour backbenchers would have to wait a while to be rewarded for their flattering speeches of the government’s actions following the recent reshuffle.

He said: “So many honourable gentleman from the benches opposite seem to have forgotten the reshuffle was a couple of days ago. They’re going to have to wait another few months and possibly years for their obsequiousness to be rewarded.”

His comments came during the second reading of the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill, which focused on the Government’s plans to hand over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.

During the debate, Mr Tugendhat said: “This building, this chamber, is a waste of time.

“A complete waste of time, when our electors hear and our fellow citizens hear that actually we have listened to the arguments of Mauritius, we’ve listened to the arguments of China, we’ve listened to the arguments of India and the United States, but we’re not willing to listen to the arguments of Britain.

“We’re not willing to stand up for the interests of the British people. We’re not willing to look at the strategic interests of UK defence.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in