Law profession can't handle talented women, says Baroness Hale

Britain's most senior female judge accuses the legal elite of practising 'unconscious' sexism

Will Gant
Thursday 14 March 2013 19:50
Comments
Baroness Hale says legal recruiters are prejudiced
Baroness Hale says legal recruiters are prejudiced

Britain’s most senior female judge has criticised “unconscious” sexism among legal elites , saying that talented women are overlooked for senior jobs because interviewers are more comfortable with men.

Baroness Hale of Richmond, the only female Supreme Court justice, said appointing judges from more diverse backgrounds would improve the “democratic legitimacy” of the legal system. In a public lecture at the London School of Economics on Wednesday night, Baroness Hale called for less rigidity in a system that selects almost exclusively from a small pool of seasoned lawyers. She also accused some legal recruiters of letting ingrained prejudice affect their hiring decisions.

“I suspect they’re not very good at assessing people who have come from different backgrounds,” she said. “We think we have got equal opportunities, but I would guess, for all sorts of reasons, they’re not necessarily truly equal because so much assessment of merit is subjective.

“There’s an awful lot of unconscious assumptions and judgements that are made when people don’t realise that that’s what they’re doing. The more used they are to having women, and people from ethnic minorities, around, the less that’s a problem because they know how we behave. But if you hardly ever see a woman, you don’t really know how to assess somebody who’s a candidate.”

Law Society statistics show that 47 per cent of solicitors are women, compared to 35 per cent of barristers in 2010, the most recent year for which figures are available. Women make up 12 per cent of Queen’s Counsel, the most senior barristers, along with just 21 out of 148 judges in the Court of Appeal and High Court.

All but one of the 23 people consulted over judicial appointments to the Supreme Court are men.

The baroness said she was the “first girl from my school to study law”, but decided to become a legal academic instead of a practising lawyer after graduating from Cambridge.

In 1994 she became the first High Court judge to be appointed from an academic background rather than a career as a barrister.

She said: “It is tiring to have to be talking about why we have so few women in the higher ranks of the judiciary in this country when most countries in the world have solved the problem. It is a bore. I would like us not to have to talk about it, but we do have to talk about it because the present situation is terrible.”

The baroness said she approved of proposals for a so-called “tie-breaker” system, which would create a presumption in favour of appointing a candidate from a minority background if all applicants were seen as being equally suitable. She added: “That’s a sort of affirmative action, but it’s not positive discrimination.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in