Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

M&S takes biscuit: teacakes cost Treasury £3.5m

Geoff Meade,Pa
Thursday 10 April 2008 15:29 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The humble chocolate teacake cost the Treasury £3.5 million today. That's the price of a VAT mistake which classified Marks & Spencer teacakes as chocolate biscuits.

Twenty years later HM Customs and Excise acknowledged the error and said teacakes are chocolate cakes after all - a crucial distinction because chocolate biscuits are subject to standard-rate VAT and chocolate cakes are zero-rated.

But by the time the error was corrected Marks & Spencer had handed over £3.5m in wrongly paid VAT on its teacake sales, and demanded the money back.

Today the European Court of Justice agreed that a teacake is a biscuit and confirmed that the Treasury should reimburse the retailer.

The 12-year legal battle began when the Commissioners of Customs and Excise acknowledged the error - but only offered £350,000 back on the grounds that 90% of the VAT had been passed on to Marks & Spencer customers: paying back the total sum would therefore mean "unjust enrichment" for the store.

In addition, the Commissioners invoked a three-year limit on claims for repayment - and ended up handing back just £88,440.

But the judges said today that traders were entitled to correct application of national VAT rules, and had a right to a refund of any VAT wrongly charged.

The verdict said EU rules did not in principle prevent HM Customs holding back some repayments if a full refund would mean "unjust enrichment" for a trader.

But because the "unjust enrichment" clause was applied differently to traders owing the Treasury money than to those owed money - contrary to EU rules on equal treatment, the clause could not be invoked in this case.

Tony McClenaghan, head of indirect tax at Deloitte, which acted for M&S, said: "This judgment entitles M&S to claim back £3.5m in overpaid VAT, bringing to an end an epic dispute after 12 years and two trips to the European Court of Justice. This is a sweet victory for M&S, for whom this was as much a matter of principle as about recovering the money."

VAT was introduced in the UK in 1973. Under the rules, "Chocolate covered products" were all classed as biscuits and not as cakes - even chocolate teacakes.

It was not until September 1994 that HM Customs acknowledged the error, despite another European legal case which had already ruled that Jaffa cakes were cakes and not, as they had been classified, biscuits.

At an earlier hearing last year, an Advocate-General at the European Court helpfully set out the VAT confusion which triggered the case: "In general, the supply of food is zero-rated for value added tax in the UK. Confectionery is an exception to such favourable tax treatment and is taxed at the full rate.

"There is an exception to that exception for cakes and biscuits, which are subject to the zero rate of tax applying to food.

"Biscuits wholly or partly covered with chocolate, however, are regarded as confectionery and taxed accordingly at the full rate".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in