Opponents of renationalising the railways have some impressive numbers to bolster their case

Expertise is not the sole preserve of the private sector

Simon Calder
Saturday 19 September 2015 20:48
Comments

Opponents of renationalising the railways can wheel out some impressive numbers to bolster their case. In the two decades since privatisation began, the number of rail passengers nationwide has more than doubled. London Waterloo alone will handle 100 million passengers this year, making it the busiest transport hub in Europe, well ahead of Heathrow.

Correlation does not signify causation, however. Proponents of renationalisation can point to the taxpayers’ billions pumped into projects such as the West Coast mainline refurbishment and Great Western electrification. Much-needed public investment to boost capacity and cut journey times has rewarded firms such as Virgin Trains.

Yet yearning for the golden, preprivatisation days of British Rail is misplaced, because the passenger experience was dire.

Successive governments had regarded the railways as an expensive nuisance. When spending cuts were needed, the trains could be squeezed until the rivets squeaked. Despite heroic efforts from frontline staff and managers, train journeys were expensive and unreliable.

Parts of the privatisation process were botched, but the sector arrived with ambition to revive an industry wearily accustomed to managing decline.

For the first time in living memory, the terms “new trains” and “cross-country routes” were used in the same sentence with Sir Richard Branson’s plans for better links connecting Newcastle with Plymouth and Manchester with Southampton.

Chiltern Railways put hundreds of millions into restoring the double tracks between London and Birmingham – but Chiltern is owned by Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s nationalised railway operator, and that highlights the weakness in present arrangements: rail franchise bids are welcome from public-sector firms, so long as they are foreign.

Directly Operated Railways, a Department for Transport offshoot, took over the East Coast line when the franchisee walked away, and ran it brilliantly. But the team was not allowed to bid to retain the route. Expertise and imagination are not the sole preserve of the private sector.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in