Oxford University graduate sues institution for £1m after claiming 'poor teaching' cost him his career
Faiz Siddiqui says he would have become a successful lawyer if he had he got better marks
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Louise Thomas
Editor
A graduate is taking Oxford University to court because he failed to achieve a 2:1 degree.
Launching a High Court bid for £1 million in damages Faiz Siddiqui claimed he underachieved because of “inadequate” teaching at the prestigious institution.
He said he would have become a top corporate lawyer had he done better in his exams.
Mr Siddiqui, who studied at Brasenose College, claimed he received sub-standard teaching on the Indian special subject part of his modern history course and therefore missed out on a First or high 2:1 in his finals in June 2000.
He blamed the fact that some of his lecturers were on sabbatical leave and says a tutor also failed to submit medical information to examiners on his behalf.
Mr Siddiqui said his clinical depression and insomnia have been worsened by his “inexplicable failure”.
The court heard that, as a student, Mr Siddiqui was a “driven young man” planning to complete further studies at an Ivy League university in the US and pursue a career in law.
His lawyer, Roger Mallalieu, said: “Whilst a 2:1 degree from Oxford might rightly seem like a tremendous achievement to most, it fell significantly short of Mr Siddiqui’s expectations and was, to him, a huge disappointment.
“Mr Siddiqui has been badly let down by Oxford. He went there with high – perhaps extraordinarily high – expectations.”
Mr Mallalieu said his client was the “victim of poor teaching” and was “uniquely disadvantaged” because his personal tutor had not passed on details about his illnesses to those responsible for deciding whether allowances should be made for students during exams.
Mr Siddiqui’s career in legal and tax roles since then was “frankly poor” and he is now unemployed, Mr Mallalieu said.
Oxford University denies negligence and says the case was brought “massively” outside the legal time limit.
A spokesperson said: “The University of Oxford is robustly defending the claim brought by Mr Siddiqui. It is not appropriate for the institution to make any further comment while there is ongoing litigation.”
The case is expected to last for seven days.
Additional reporting by agencies.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments