Philip Green to lodge complaint against Lord Hain for naming him in parliament

Businessman denies allegations of 'unlawful sexual or racist behaviour' towards staff

Philip Green named by Lord Peter Hain as businessman in NDA case

Sir Philip Green is to make a formal complaint against the Labour peer who exposed him as the businessman at the centre of sexual harassment allegations.

The Arcadia chairman was named by Peter Hain under protection of parliamentary privilege after taking out a temporary privacy injunction to prevent the media from publishing the claims.

It has since emerged that the law firm Gordon Dadds, which is acting for The Daily Telegraph in the case, employs Lord Hain as a global and governmental adviser.

Sir Philip now intends to complain to parliamentary authorities that Lord Hain failed to disclose he had a financial relationship with the Telegraph’s lawyers.

“I have been advised that his actions are likely to have been a breach of the House of Lords Code of Conduct,” said Sir Philip.

“As many people have said Lord Hain’s blatant disregard of a judgment made by three senior judges is outrageous.

“If he hadn’t read the judgment, on what basis was he apparently talking about it. If he had, Gordon Dadds’ name is on the front page.

“I will be lodging formal complaints with the relevant authorities in the House of Lords.”

Sir Philip also repeated his statement that he “wholly and categorically” denies any allegation of “unlawful sexual or racist behaviour”.

Responding to the statement, Lord Hain said: “I always comply fully with my House of Lords obligations as I did on that occasion. Green’s ‘complaint’ is a malevolent diversion.

“I stand resolutely by what I’ve said and neither retract nor apologise for standing up for human rights against power, privilege and wealth.”

Lord Hain has been criticised by legal experts for naming the businessman in parliament while the case was still going through the courts.

Former attorney general Dominic Grieve QC said Lord Hain’s behaviour had been “clearly arrogant”.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The Conservative MP said the legal process had been turned into a “political witch hunt” and that parliamentary privilege was “open to abuse”.

He added: “I can’t see – looking at this particular matter – that Peter Hain can argue that he hasn’t abused it.”

Lord Hain said he felt he had a “duty” to name Sir Philip after being told that non-disclosure agreements and substantial payments were being used “to conceal the truth about serious and repeated sexual harassment, racist abuse and bullying”.

“I categorically state that I was completely unaware Gordon Dadds were advising The Telegraph regarding this case,” he said. “Gordon Dadds, a highly respected and reputable international law firm, played absolutely no part whatsoever in either the sourcing of my information or my independent decision to name Sir Philip.

“They were completely unaware of my intentions until after I spoke in the House of Lords.”

The identification of Sir Philip led to fresh calls for the Honours Forfeiture Committee to consider withdrawing his knighthood.

Downing Street stressed that the Honours Forfeiture Committee was independent.

“They are constantly reviewing evidence in relation to matters like this,” a No 10 spokeswoman said.

Additional reporting by Press Association

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in