Princess Eugenie's £2m wedding bill should be paid by her father, Labour MP demands

‘Who’s heard of her anyway?’ asks Chris Williamson

Colin Drury
Saturday 18 August 2018 18:16
Comments
Princess Eugenie to marry boyfriend Jack Brooksbank

Princess Eugenie’s reported £2m wedding bill – which is being footed by taxpayers – should be paid by her father, a Labour MP has said.

Chris Williamson has demanded the “fabulously wealthy” Prince Andrew, Duke of York, stump up for the mammoth chit – which has been heavily criticised.

Princess Eugenie is ninth in line to the throne and carries out no royal duties.

She will marry Jack Brooksbank at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle – where Prince Harry wed Meghan Markle – on 12 October.

The wedding was initially expected to cost around £750,000 and was set to be paid for by the couple’s parents, but security costs have more than doubled it to almost £2m, according to the Daily Mirror.

A royal source told the newspaper: “The Duke of York has insisted his daughter’s wedding must be a huge occasion to be remembered and wants everyone to get on board to celebrate the happy couple.”

But in an interview with Sky News, Mr Williamson, MP for Derby North, said: “There is no need to have such a glamorous event.

“Prince Andrew – who is fabulously wealthy with an estimated worth of £65m – should foot the bill himself.

“Who’s heard of Princess Eugenie anyway? She carries no royal functions, no useful purpose to the public sphere and yet we’re having to spend this kind of money.”

The extra cash will reportedly fund more police officers on overtime rates. The increased presence is especially needed after Eugenie is understood to have demanded an open top carriage ride as part of the nuptials.

Emma Dent Coad, Labour MP for Kensington, where Eugenie and Mr Brooksbank live in Kensington Palace at a vastly reduced rent, also condemned the bill.

“In these times of heightened security risks it is irresponsible for a minor member of the royal family to have a high profile, very public wedding,” she said. “This may be the time to review the role and cost of minor royals.”

The controversy comes shortly after the princess said in a TV interview that she wanted to be seen as “real”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in