Sewell says commission did find evidence of ‘persistent discrimination’ despite controversial race report

‘We can be wise after the event,’ said race report author Tony Sewell

Nadine White
Race Correspondent
Friday 28 May 2021 15:02
Comments
<p>Dr Tony Sewell, who headed the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities</p>

Dr Tony Sewell, who headed the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities

A commission on racial inequality found evidence of “persistent race-based discrimination”, its chair told MPs on Thursday – despite barely mentioning the phrase in its widely contested report published earlier this year.

Tony Sewell, 62, headed up the 10-person, government-appointed Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities that examined imbalances in education, employment, crime and policing and health.

The commission found no evidence of “institutional racism” in Britain, and said class, family influence, wealth, culture and religion “have more significant impact on life chances than the existence of racism”.

The findings were criticised as insulting and divisive, and Dr Sewell was accused of putting a “positive spin on slavery and empire” when explaining the commission’s recommendation on the teaching of history in schools.

Giving evidence to the Women and Equalities Select Committee on Thursday, Dr Sewell said: “Right from the outset we found evidence of persistent race-based discrimination. That was a key area; racism exists and it was persistent, it was there and it was a real fight. And we report that in the report.”

However, the issue is not wholly acknowledged in the lengthy 258-page report.

The phrase “persistent race-based discrimination” is mentioned only once, in the conclusion, which reads: “We have focused not just on persistent race-based discrimination but on the role of cultural traditions, including family, within different minority groups, the overlap between ethnic and socioeconomic disadvantage, and the agency we have as individuals and groups.”

Dr Sewell was answering questions from committee chair Caroline Nokes MP and a group of MPs including Nicola Richards, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Kim Johnson.

Asked by Ms Ribeiro-Addy why the commission did not recommend ethnicity pay gap reporting, Dr Sewell cited contested data from the Office of National Statistics, which suggests Black and Arab women earn more than white women. These figures have been questioned due to a small sample size.

Dr Sewell also conceded that the commission may have been wrong to only brief a select group of journalists about the contents of the report, saying “we can be wise after the event”.

Former police superintendent Keith Fraser, who is one of 10 members of the race commission, also appeared before the committee, saying “we know institutional racism exists” in the UK, even though the report stated categorically that it found no evidence of this.

The report even criticised the way the term has been applied, saying it should not be used as a “catch-all” phrase.

The government has accepted the commission’s 24 recommendations and will publish an action plan in the coming weeks.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in