Retailers ban 'sexy' underwear for children under 12
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Thongs, black underwear and padded bras have been banned for sale to under-12s by high street retailers after a backlash against the sexualisation of children.
Marks & Spencer, Next, Tesco and other chains have agreed to guidelines that bar them from stocking clothes that "sexualise or unduly gender stereotype" children under 12.
The guidelines are published by the British Retail Consortium (BRC) today as the Government releases a review into the commercialisation and sexualisation of children, which is expected to recommend several steps to reverse a trend considered by many parents to be damaging and weird.
David Cameron ordered the review by Reg Bailey, chief executive of the Mothers' Union, following a series of examples of leading retailers using sexual or inappropriate branding on children's products.
In two speeches, in 2006 and last year, Mr Cameron criticised the sale of a range of padded bras and sexy knickers for the under-10s by Bhs (quickly withdrawn), a "Lolita" bed aimed at six-year-olds and T-shirts for primary age children that carried the Playboy logo. He described Bhs's padded bras and sexy knickers as "harmful and creepy".
The guidelines rule out slogans and imagery with "sexually suggestive, demeaning, derogative or political material, or phrasing that could be interpreted as such."
Colour ranges and cut must be "age appropriate", they stipulate, forbidding first bras being black or having padding or under-wiring.
The eight-page document says: "Knickers and pants must provide modesty; thongs are not appropriate for children."
It advises marketing directors: "Photography should feature children in natural poses in a childlike environment, appropriate to the age range concerned. When make-up is used, it should be as natural as possible."
Argos, Debenhams, George at Asda, John Lewis, M&S, Next, Peacocks, Sainsbury's and Tesco have signed up to the voluntary initiative. Primark – found in an investigation by Channel 4 to carry the most sexualised of children's products – and Sir Philip Green's Bhs and Topshop chains, have not, because they are not members of the BRC.
Retailers hope that, by announcing these moves on the day of the launch of a government review into children's sexualisation, they will pre-empt any criticism.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments