Royal family criticise BBC for ‘overblown and unfounded claims’ in documentary

The royal family said it was ‘disappointing’ that the BBC had given ‘credibility’ to claims that insiders from royal households had briefed journalists behind the scenes

Holly Bancroft
Tuesday 23 November 2021 19:52
Comments
<p>The first episode of the two-part ‘The Princes and the Press’ programme, explored the relationship of the Duke of Cambridge and the Duke of Sussex with the media</p>

The first episode of the two-part ‘The Princes and the Press’ programme, explored the relationship of the Duke of Cambridge and the Duke of Sussex with the media

The royal family has issued a rare joint statement accusing the BBC of giving credibility to “overblown and unfounded claims” in a documentary that aired on Monday night.

The three royal households, Buckingham Palace, Kensington Palace and Clarence House, said that it was “disappointing” that the broadcaster had decided to lend “credibility” to claims that insiders from other royal households had briefed against the Sussexes.

Their statement was broadcast at the end of the first episode of the two-part The Princes and The Press programme, presented by the BBC’s media editor Amol Rajan.

The programme explored the relationship that the Duke of Cambridge and the Duke of Sussex both had with the media and included suggestions that royal sources were briefing journalists behind the scenes.

The royal households said: “A free, responsible and open press is of vital importance to a healthy democracy. However, too often it is overblown and unfounded claims from unnamed sources that are presented as facts and it is disappointing when anyone, including the BBC, gives them credibility.”

During the programme, journalist Omid Scobie, co-author of the biography of the Sussexes, Finding Freedom, said that negative stories had been leaked about Meghan but did not name those who were involved.

He said: “There were some people who felt she [Meghan] needed to be put in her place. I think by leaking a negative story, that’s punishment. There’s been rumours for quite some time that a lot of the most damaging and negative stories … have come from other royal households or from other royal aides. From my own research and reporting, that’s exactly true.”

Journalist and GB News anchor Dan Wooton spoke in the documentary about his story on “Tiaragate”, published in November 2018. The article, published in The Sun, claimed that Meghan and members of the royal household had a row over the pick of a tiara for her wedding to Prince Harry.

He also addressed bullying claims made by Meghan’s staff about her – claims she denies and that are now the subject of a palace investigation. Dan Wooton said: “It took six months for it to get out after the wedding so when people like to say the press are going for Harry and Meghan, you had it in for Harry and Meghan. I completely disagree.

“It was actually these people behind the scenes who started to get annoyed, before any of it was public. At that point no national newspaper had dared to really dive into this huge war that was developing behind the scenes ... It did take someone like me, as an outsider and actually say ‘no I’m going to do it’.”

Jenny Afia, from the law firm Schillings, spoke to Amol Rajan on the programme about the bullying claims. She said: “Those stories were false. This narrative that no one can work for the Duchess of Sussex, she was too difficult and demanding as a boss and everyone had to leave, it’s just not true.”

Following the airing of the programme, The Sun reported on Monday that Prince William has banned aides from briefing against family members. A senior royal source told the paper: “William was clear from the start we were never to brief and never to say anything about anyone in the other households. He’d lived through that in the Nineties with his parents in the War of the Waleses and doesn’t ever want it happening again.

“He’s in a much better place [with the press] than his brother.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in