Tommy Robinson hired private investigator to find Independent journalist, court hears

‘I asked and said I’d pay for information to find Lizzie Dearden,’ English Defence Leader founder tells court

Zoe Tidman
Thursday 26 August 2021 20:19
<p>English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson arrives at Westminster Magistrates Court</p>

English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson arrives at Westminster Magistrates Court

Leer en Español

Tommy Robinson hired a private investigator to find out the address of a journalist from The Independent who was working on an article about him, a court has heard.

The English Defence League (EDL) founder, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, turned up at the home of Lizzie Dearden after she contacted him about an investigation into claims he misappropriated donations from his supporters.

Robinson appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court on Thursday regarding an application for a stalking protection order.

He told the court he “panicked” after seeing the email giving him the right to reply over a weekend – urgent due to the article’s deadline.

“I contacted a private investigator,” he said. “And I asked, and said I’d pay, for information to find Lizzie Dearden.”

He explained that he did this as, “the email stated if I didn’t respond by Monday morning they would run with the story”.

He went to the home of The Independent’s home affairs and security correspondent and her boyfriend Samuel Partridge shortly before 10pm on 17 January.

Robinson, who told the court he relies on filming footage of himself due to social media bans, said the plan was to record himself giving Ms Dearden “all of the evidence”, claiming her article relied on an “unreliable source” and that the allegations were untrue.

Asked why he simply did not reply to the email or publish a written response, he said his videos gain more attention.

“A visual video of me, giving the evidence to the journalist, and her still reporting lies, would get shared,” the EDL founder told the court.

Ryan Dowding, representing the Metropolitan Police, told the court that “over time” Robinson “became fixated” on the journalist.

“So fixated, that rather than simply respond to her standard right to reply email or ask for more time, he decided to pay a ‘PI’ to obtain information about Ms Dearden, including her address, and to attend that address at 10pm on a Sunday night.”

The court heard how Ms Dearden emailed Robinson on the afternoon of Friday, 15 January, to ask for a comment for an article by the morning of Monday, 18 January.

Alex di Francesco, representing Robinson, told the court the deadline was “unreasonably short”.

Robinson told the court: “As soon as I saw the email, I felt sick. I was scared. I was worried. I knew what was coming with regards to what the headlines would say.”

After finding out Ms Dearden’s address, Robinson said a friend drove him to her home.

“The timing, unfortunately, I had until the next morning to do this,” he told the court. “Otherwise the whole world was going to be told lies about me. I had no choice but to go at that time.”

Robinson said he went to eat after failing to meet the journalist.

Ms Dearden, who gave evidence remotely last week, said she was “too frightened” to go down to speak to Robinson when he was outside her home.

“From what I could hear on the intercom and through the street, he sounded very angry and agitated,” she told the court.

Mr Dowding previously told the court that during Robinson’s time outside Ms Dearden’s home there was, “shouting about Mr Partridge, claiming he was a paedophile”, adding: “There were then threats to come back every day if he needed to.”

On Thursday, Mr Dowding described the allegation about Mr Partridge as “baseless” and “nonsense”, and put it to Robinson that he knew the allegation was “completely unsubstantiated”.

Robinson said the allegation came in a comment from “an unreliable source” in a “research group” used to find out information.

Deputy chief magistrate Tan Ikram agreed to impose an interim order in March prior to the full application for a stalking protection order.

On Thursday, Mr Ikram said he will give his judgment on a future date.

The interim order will remain in place until 13 October unless it is revoked.

Additional reporting by Press Association

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in