Windsor council set to fine homeless people sleeping rough before royal wedding

Penalty 'inhumane', says homelessness group

Harriet Agerholm
Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:25
Comments
Windor and Maidenhead Council wants to ban people from leaving their belongings ‘unattended’ on the street
Windor and Maidenhead Council wants to ban people from leaving their belongings ‘unattended’ on the street

People sleeping rough in Windsor could be fined up to £100 under proposed measures to reduce the visibility of homelessness in the borough ahead of the royal wedding.

Windsor and Maidenhead Council wants to ban people from begging and from leaving their belongings, including their bedding, “unattended” on the street.

The council hopes the “robust strategy” will reduce rough sleepers by 50 per cent by the end of March, ahead of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s wedding at Windsor Castle on 19 May.

The proposals come after Windsor council leader Simon Dudley said the number of rough sleepers would put Windsor in a “sadly unfavourable light” when it hosts the wedding.

He demanded police use legal powers to clear the area of those sleeping rough, claiming homeless people chose to sleep on the streets and there was “high-quality housing” available to them.

Mr Dudley survived a vote of no confidence and now the council is preparing a consultation on measures to get the borough’s 14 long-term rough sleepers off the streets.

Proposals include increasing support available for rough sleepers, including accommodation and specialist services for issues such as addiction and mental health.

But those who refuse to engage with the services in a 56-day window will be issued with a Community Protection Notice requiring them to attend or face a fine of up to £100.

The fine will be cut to £50 for early payment, but offenders could face a summary conviction and a £1,000 fine if they do not pay.

The council said the measures were needed to tackle what it called “aggressive or proactive begging” such as begging near a cash machine or in a manner “reasonably perceived to be intimidating or aggressive”.

Other proposals under consideration are banning any verbal, non-verbal or written requests for money, and leaving bedding, personal belongings and other material in public places.

A spokesman for the council said that no date for the consultation to begin had been set, or for when any future strategy may start, but the proposals could be implemented within a matter of months.

The report said: “It is proposed that the strategy be developed quickly so that the benefits for the vulnerable individuals can be realised as soon as possible.”

The report said any future strategy aimed “to both strengthen the current offer of support afforded to those rough sleeping, and at the same time ensuring there are consequences for those who behave antisocially and or fail to engage with support offered”.

It proposed a multi-agency approach including outreach workers, housing support officers and community wardens.

The spokesman said: “Every rough sleeper has complex and personal needs that we work to address on an individual basis.

“As part of the developing strategy we will look at what support is offered by the borough and other organisations.”

Murphy James, from the Windsor Homeless Project, was sceptical of the plans or how the council proposed to fine someone “who quite evidently, has no money”.

He told the BBC: “Criminalise real criminals, not those that are forced into a situation by circumstance and left to survive. That is quite simply inhumane.”

In January it emerged the number of people sleeping rough in England was at a record high – after a 73 per cent increase over the last three years.

Official government data shows that on any given night in autumn last year, 4,751 people were recorded sleeping on the streets, more than double the number who were in 2010.

Press Association contributed to this report

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in