Home Office to lift cap on ‘inadequate’ help for trafficking victims

Ministers agree to scrap controversial 45-day limit on post-exploitation support

May Bulman
Social Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 02 July 2019 15:40
Why is the Home Office getting so many immigration decisions wrong?

The Home Office has been accused of “failing for years” in its legal obligation to support victims of trafficking after ministers admitted current provision falls short of what is needed.

Campaigners have long argued that the 45-day policy, which limits support for victims – such as safe housing, financial support and counselling – to six weeks, is “woefully inadequate” and forces some victims to move on before they are ready, risking re-exploitation.

Now the Home Office has conceded that the cap on this support – eligible to any individual who is recognised as a victim by the national referral mechanism (NRM) – is incompatible with international standards and should be based on an individual’s needs rather than a length of time.

The department has committed to creating a “needs-based system” in which support would not be restricted to 45 days or any other length of time.

A legal challenge by two victims saw the High Court rule in March that the 45-day policy risked causing “irreparable harm to very vulnerable individuals” and was potentially unlawful.

One of the victims was an Albanian woman trafficked from her home country and forced into sex work. She had a young daughter and after she escaped the exploitation she relied on her support worker for both emotional support and financial assistance.

The other was a man who was trafficked from Vietnam to the UK and forced into cannabis cultivation. He had been beaten by his traffickers and suffered from several mental health conditions, and relied on his support worker and the financial assistance provided to people in his situation.

Lawyers, politicians and charities welcomed the decision, but said many people who had been enslaved had already been left “at the mercy of the 45-day cliff edge drop in support”, and cautioned that the Home Office plans for support must be “clearly defined”.

Ahmed Aydeed, director at Duncan Lewis Solicitors, said he was glad the legal challenge had forced the Home Office to withdraw its current policy, but highlighted that the government had “been failing for years in its legal obligation to support victims of trafficking”, leaving them “at the mercy of the 45 day cliff edge drop in support”.

He added: “It is beyond belief that the home secretary has been applying this policy for years, only now accepting that the law requires a needs-based system, not delimited by time alone. I’m saddened by the number of victims that have lost vital support over the years, when they so desperately needed it.”

Labour MP Paul Blomfield said: “Despite the government’s repeated statements that it wishes to protect and support survivors of human trafficking, many have been let down by woefully inadequate post-NRM support.

“This decision is welcome, but whether a new approach benefits victims will depend on how decisions are made and who makes them.”

Mr Blomfield highlighted research from the charity Focus on Labour Exploitation (Flex) demonstrating how Home Office immigration priorities are “repeatedly hampering” efforts to prevent human trafficking and protect victims, in some cases even leading to retrafficking.

“The Home Office has a major conflict of interest between its immigration policies and its modern slavery duty, so the new policy emerging from this judgement needs to ensure independent decisions focussed on people’s rights,” he added.

Kate Roberts, UK and Europe programme manager of Anti-Slavery International, said: “The fact that confirmed victims of trafficking should no longer be made to leave support before they are ready is hugely welcomed and long overdue. For too long victims have been identified as trafficked only to have support cut off leaving them destitute and open to re-exploitation.

“What support entails will now be key – support needs to be specialist and able to respond to individual needs as well as advocate for access to rights and entitlements.”

Kate Garbers, managing director at the modern slavery charity Unseen, said the move was a “welcomed improvement”, but that this support was often reliant on the availability of local provisions, such as housing and face-to-face support – so could become a “postcode lottery” if expectations are not “clearly defined”.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The government is committed to stamping out modern slavery and providing victims with the support they need to begin rebuilding their lives.

“We are always building our understanding of the complex needs of victims of modern slavery and striving to improve the support available.

“We have already significantly increased support for victims earlier this year, and we will continue to drive improvements to the services available to ensure they are meeting the recovery needs of victims.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in