More than 60,000 sign petition calling for vote of no confidence in Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt

If it reaches 100,000 it will be considered for a debate in Parliament 

Ashley Cowburn
Friday 12 February 2016 14:03
Comments
Junior Doctors protest outside the Department of Health at the Government's intention to impose new contracts
Junior Doctors protest outside the Department of Health at the Government's intention to impose new contracts

More than 60,000 people in less than 24 hours have signed a petition calling for the government to debate a vote of no confidence in Jeremy Hunt, amid an intense row over junior doctors' contracts.

The growing backlash from the public follows the Health Secretary’s controversial decision to impose the new junior doctor contract without further negotiations with the medical profession. The British Medical Association said that it would consider “all options open to us” and a full walk-out from accident and emergency departments will be back on the table.

The petition, which is gathering momentum on social media, says: “Mr Hunt recently gave totally inappropriate advice to Google conditions before seeking medical opinion.

It adds: “He referred to Paramedics as Ambulance Drivers and has caused the first Doctors strike in years of the NHS. Mr Hunt is destroying all staff morale in the NHS & will cause recruitment issues.”

The government is obliged to respond to petitions submitted to its website that reach 10,000. If it reaches 100,000 it will be considered by a committee made up of 11 MPs and has the potential to end up as a debate in the Commons.

Meanwhile, a second petition also gathering momentum has been launched, calling on the Health Secretary to resume meaningful contract negotiations with the BMA. At the time of writing, it had over 45,000 signatures.

Junior Doctors Contract

The petition says: “J. Hunt is to impose a new contract. As incoming junior doctors, with GMC registration, starting work as an FY1 in August 2016 and junior doctors working within the NHS we will refuse to sign the imposed contract and will continue strike action on behalf of the medical profession and greater public.”

Yesterday, the Health Secretary announced that NHS junior doctors will be forced to accept a controversial new contract without agreement or further negotiation. He added that imposing the contract unilaterally would end “uncertainty” in the health service.

Doctors have been on strike over the new contract, which they say will put patient safety at risk and leave medics working the longest hours worse off.

The new terms of employment re-define anti-social hours and make it cheaper for hospitals to roster doctors on weekends and evenings. In retaliation, up to 300 junior doctors and other campaigners protested outside Mr Hunt’s department and called on him to resign.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in