£2m of aid money was used to fund Pope's visit

 

Oliver Wright
Thursday 03 February 2011 01:00
Comments

Nearly £2 million intended to be spent helping development in the world's poorest countries was diverted to pay for the Pope's visit to Britain. The Department for International Development gave £1.85m to the Foreign Office to help to pay for the costs of Pope Benedict's visit to England and Scotland last September.

DFID insisted that the money for the visit did not come from ring-fenced funds used for overseas aid. However, it admitted it would come out of central funds – used to support DFID projects around the world.

The revelation emerged in a report from the House of Commons international development select committee.

The "somewhat surprising" transfer to the Foreign Office was queried following a detailed investigation of DFID's annual accounts.

Initial figures published in November put the cost to Whitehall departments of the four-day state visit in November at £10m.

The committee called on ministers to explain how diverting development cash to subsidise the trip met global aid rules.

Malcolm Bruce, who chairs the international development select committee, said voters would struggle to understand why DFID money was involved. "Many people will be as surprised as we were to discover that UK aid money was used to fund the Pope's visit last year," he said. "Ministers need to explain exactly what this was spent on and how it tallies with our commitments on overseas aid."

DFID said it was one of a number of government departments that part- funded the Pope's visit.

"Our contribution recognised the Catholic Church's role as a major provider of health and education services in developing countries. This money does not constitute official development assistance and is therefore additional to the Coalition Government's historic commitment to meet the 0.7 per cent UN aid target from 2013."

The committee also warned that the higher priority being given in aid spending to war zones and other fragile states would make it harder to be sure taxpayers' cash was being well spent.

The committee welcomed the concentration on fragile states – generally the most poverty-stricken – but cautioned that it would lead to "severe difficulties in ensuring every pound is well spent in war-torn environments with corrupt and incompetent governments".

Well-run countries where the money might prove more effective were also bound to lose out, it said.

The committee also warned against being over-zealous in cutting administrative costs.

"The savings set out in the spending review should make it one of the most efficient development organisations in the world – with fewer back office and more frontline staff – provided they do not undermine DFID's ability to do its work effectively," Mr Bruce said.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in