Brexit donor Arron Banks contradicted his own evidence over source of £8m funding for Leave campaign, senior MP says

Businessman faces criminal probe over millions of pounds of loans and donations to Leave.EU

Lizzy Buchan
Political Correspondent
Monday 05 November 2018 11:32 GMT
Damian Collins:' What's not clear is where the money came from to get to that holding company in the first place'

Brexit backer Arron Banks is facing fresh pressure to explain the source of £8m of funding for the Leave campaign amid claims from a senior MP that he had contradicted his own evidence.

The millionaire businessman is facing a criminal probe over millions of pounds of loans and donations to Leave.EU – a group he co-founded – which has been linked to possible Russian interference in the EU referendum.

Mr Banks sowed confusion when he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday that all the cash came from a UK-registered company, Rock Services. He insisted he was being targeted by politicians trying to overturn the result of the Brexit vote.

However Damian Collins, the influential Tory chairman of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said Mr Banks had previously given evidence to parliament that the company generated no cash of its own and only existed to provide services to his other businesses.

The National Crime Agency launched an investigation into “suspected criminal offences” by Mr Banks and Leave.EU when the elections watchdog said it had reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Banks was not the true source of the cash.

The Electoral Commission also suspects the money came from Rock Services parent, Rock Holdings, which is registered in the Isle of Man. This would be impermissible under finance rules, the watchdog said.

Mr Collins told the BBC’s Today programme: “Basically Arron Banks said the money came from a holding company that he told the select committee provides services to the other companies he owns.

“What’s not clear is where the money came from to get to that holding company in the first place, because this is a business that in and of itself doesn’t generate cash. The question is where did the money come from?

“It is a discrepancy because what he told us was that Rock Services really just provides services to other companies that he owns – provides cash, makes payments. It doesn’t make any money itself. It’s not selling products and services and generating cash.

“For Rock Services to have money to give to Leave.EU or anyone else, that money has got to have been put in that bank account by another company or another individual.

“If Rock Services made the donation, where did the money come from for Rock Services to do that? That is still not clear. No matter how many times he was asked that question, he didn’t answer it.”

The Conservative MP rejected Mr Banks’ claims that the probe was about trying to stop Brexit, saying it was a matter for parliament, not another referendum.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

He added: “There are two issues here. There is the Brexit process which is ongoing and there is what should be a full and proper investigation into Mr Banks and the source of his funds.”

The row stems from a review of referendum finances by the Electoral Commission, which centres on £2m reported to have been loaned to Better For The Country – which ran Leave.EU – by Mr Banks and his insurance companies. The review also looked at a £6m donation, which he made alone.

Mr Banks and Leave.EU chief executive Liz Bilney deny any wrongdoing.

On Sunday, Mr Banks said: “There was no Russian money and no interference of any type. I just want to be absolutely clear about that.

“The money came from Rock Services, which was a UK limited company. It was generated out of insurance business written in the UK.

“Contrary to some of the press reports in the FT and other Remain-leaning publications, we insure nearly half a million customers a year – the size of Manchester.

“We turn over £250m of premiums, it’s a sizeable business.”

He claimed the media was attempting to undermine the Brexit result and had joined forces with a group of “vicious MPs”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in