Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Assisted Dying Bill supporters and opponents gather outside House of Lords as legislation debate gets underway

'We want life, they want death,' shouted the ‘no’ camp, dressed in white. 'Bigots,' screamed back a man in the pink-clad ‘yes’ camp

Emily Dugan
Friday 18 July 2014 20:50 BST
Comments
Should we allow people to choose when they die?
Should we allow people to choose when they die? (Rex)

A cacophony of opposing chants made the pavement outside the House of Lords a battle of voices today as fervent supporters and opponents of the Assisted Dying Bill made a last ditch attempt to have their views heard.

“We want life, they want death,” shouted the ‘no’ camp, dressed in white. “Bigots” screamed back a man in the pink-clad ‘yes’ camp, backed up by a group chant of “We want change”.

Contradictory placards added to the confusion. White signs boasted: “Only 43 per cent back bill,” while pink placards on the other side claimed “80 per cent want change.”

“Their idea of compassion is an oxymoron,” a woman who called herself Dennis Queen said, jabbing her finger at the ‘yes’ group on the other side of the metal barricade. “They don’t say it’s compassionate to kill anyone who’s not sick and disabled. It’s a eugenic law.”

Ms Queen, 41, from Manchester has an autoimmune disease and uses a wheelchair. She campaigns for Not Dead Yet and believes the bill will leave disabled people vulnerable to abuse.

“If I get depressed, which I have been before, I want to know that if that happens I’ll be afforded the same help as anyone else and not given a lethal dose,” she said.

Lucy Aliband, 44, from Richmond, who was on the pink side with Disabled Activists for Dignity in Dying, disagreed. She was in a car accident nine years ago, which gave her a brain injury and a spinal cord injury.

“There’s this perception that disabled people and their families are against assisted dying, but that’s rubbish,” she said. “This bill is not about disabled people getting assistance to die. This is for terminally ill people who are likely to die within six months. When you’ve been there and held the hand of someone dying in pain you want to be able to help.”

Julie Lewis, 61, said she thought changing the law was the only humane solution. “My father had terminal bladder cancer. He couldn’t face the indignity and the pain and at 80 years old, walking on a stick, he threw himself in front of a train at West Byfleet station. It’s a dreadful way to go but he was desperate. We call ourselves a mature, civilised society but you wouldn’t let animals suffer that way.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in