Yes camp rules out use of costly counting machines

The Liberal Democrats and Labour joined forces yesterday to issue a cast-iron pledge that a switch to the alternative vote (AV) would never require the use of electronic vote counting machines.

The campaign for a No vote in the referendum tomorrow week has claimed that a change to AV would cost £250m – including £130m on machines. It argues that counting will take much longer under AV, in which voters can list candidates in order of preference instead of casting one vote under the existing first-past-the-post system.

Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, told The Independent that votes would still be counted manually if the public vote Yes to AV. He said: "It's time to put to bed the No campaign's baseless claim that AV will require expensive new voting machines. I should know. I am the person in Government with direct say over our policy on how elections are run. There will be no electronic voting machines. It will not happen. We do not need them."

Mr Clegg said the past few days had exposed the untruths the No campaign had been peddling "in a desperate attempt to cling on to the discredited politics of the past". He added: "Now the nature of their campaign has been exposed we want to focus on the key benefits that AV would bring; giving voters more power and choice, ending safe seats for life and making MPs reach out to more of their constituents."

Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, added: "Australia has used the alternative vote for over 80 years without resorting to these machines. At a time when public services are being cut, there is no need for machines to be brought in if there is a Yes vote in this referendum."

However, the No camp is sticking to its guns. It highlighted a statement by Anthony Mayer, the returning officer responsible for the London mayoral and assembly elections from 2000 to 2008, saying: "If the political classes want results early on the Friday after the 10pm Thursday closure of polling stations then with AV there is no choice but electronic counting. If the political classes are relaxed about results coming in over the weekend then manual counting is feasible, if more costly on account of more counting staff hours."

Lord (Charlie) Falconer, the former Lord Chancellor, who favours a No vote, said supporters of AV "should take note of the experience of someone who has actually run elections using a preferential system – and accept that expensive vote counting machines are a necessity with the AV system".

Yesterday the Cabinet met for the first time since clashes between Conservative and Liberal Democrat ministers over AV threatened to leave permanent scars on the Coalition.

Downing Street insisted it was "business as usual", that there was "good light-hearted banter in the margins" of the Cabinet meeting but that the referendum was not discussed.

David Cameron sought to lower the temperature in a speech in Maidstone, Kent. "It's time to get back to the real arguments: what this means for Britain," he said. He described AV as "completely unfair, seriously undemocratic and hopelessly unclear" and said first-past-the-post was "clear, democratic and decisive".

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in