Boris Johnson flounders under tough questioning about gender equality in government

Female representation ‘not a joking matter’, PM told

Jon Sharman
Wednesday 27 May 2020 22:17
Comments
Boris Johnson appears to laugh off question about women in government

Boris Johnson was unable to say how many women in top jobs would be “enough” to secure proper gender representation when he was grilled by fellow Conservatives on equality in the cabinet, during a tense liaison committee hearing.

He said he thought there was sufficient number of women helping to inform decisions on coronavirus, and that having women in the room made a “huge difference” to the nature of decisions taken. “I acknowledge that may sound like a vaguely sexist thing to say, but it’s very important,” Mr Johnson said.

Caroline Nokes, the women and equalities committee chair, asked whose advice the PM had taken on reopening schools at the same time as the retail sector – where she said 60 per cent of employees were female – and how the move might impact the availability of childcare.

Mr Johnson said: “I think your question, Caroline, is directed at whether or not we’ve got sufficiently female representation at the top of government helping us to inform these decisions and I really think we have.

“The head of policy at Number 10 is Munira Mirza, the election manifesto on which we both fought successfully was written by two women and the most important appointments we’ve made just in the last couple of weeks ... have also been women.”

Following two further questions about the role of equalities experts in the government’s decision-making, Ms Nokes asked Mr Johnson: “You made the distinction between there being ‘a lot’ of women and ‘enough’ women – how many is enough?”

The prime minister, appearing to realise he had been snookered, is heard to say “Oh boy” and laugh nervously, before recovering and adding: “That’s a question on which I’m not competent to pronounce.” One of the other MPs in the virtual hearing was also heard to laugh briefly in reaction to the pointed questioning.

Ms Nokes followed up by asking, “Is it not 50 per cent?” before Sir Bernard Jenkin, the committee chair, told the prime minister gender equality was “not a joking matter”.

“It’s not,” the prime minister quickly agreed. “All I say, Caroline, is that it’s incredibly important to us as Conservatives and we have more – 50 per cent would be great – we have large numbers of female MPs of great talents, including yourself, in the House of Commons now, far more, I believe, than – and never forget, it’s only the Conservative Party that’s produced two female prime ministers.”

“Let’s not start with all that,” Sir Bernard interjected. “Best not,” said Ms Nokes, who found out she had been sacked as immigration minister by Mr Johnson in 2019 when a journalist tweeted the news.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in