Theresa May says no-deal Brexit is better than Canada-style free trade agreement

EU has rejected Chequers and said Canada-style deal likely only option

Jon Stone
Europe Correspondent
Tuesday 25 September 2018 18:48
Comments
Dominic Raab says Canada-style Brexit trade deal is 'off the table'

A no-deal Brexit would be preferable to signing a Canada-style free trade agreement with the EU, Theresa May has said.

The statement by the prime minister, who has told the EU it must accept her Chequers plan or nothing, amounts to a further of the UK’s red lines in negotiations with the bloc.

The EU has repeatedly and unanimously rejected Chequers, a stance confirmed by the 27 other EU national leaders at a summit in Salzburg last week.

The prime minister was asked by reporters flying with her to the UN in New York whether no-deal would be better than a Canada-style deal.

She replied: “I've always said no deal is better than a bad deal, and I think a bad deal, for example, would be something that broke up the United Kingdom. What we've put on the table is a good deal.

“It's a deal which retains the union of the UK, our constitutional integrity, it's a deal which provides for no hard border between Northern Ireland and Ireland, protects jobs and enables us to have good trade relationship with Europe and the rest of the world.”

The EU has said Ms May’s red lines of leaving the single market and customs union, leaving the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, and ending free movement mean that a Canada-style free trade agreement is the only realistic option on the table.

I've always said no deal is better than a bad deal, and I think a bad deal, for example, would be something that broke up the United Kingdom

Theresa May

The prime minister’s claim that such a deal would “break up the UK” is based on the suggestion that a customs border between Northern Ireland and Great Britain would amount to a breach of sovereignty.

One of these would be likely under a Canada-style FTA because it would not preserve frictionless trade between the EU and UK and would require border checks. But both sides say they do not want a hard border with Ireland, so the EU has proposed keeping Northern Ireland inside the EU customs territory so that none is required.

The bloc says that if the UK wanted to keep frictionless trade it would have to soften its red lines and do a deal like Norway and stay in the single market, and potentially additionally stay in a customs union too.

The resistance to a customs border may partly be explained by the fact it is a red-line of the DUP, the right-wing Northern Ireland unionist party on which Theresa May relies for a majority in the House of Commons. She however said no British prime minister could accept such a proposal.

There has been some movement on how to solve the Northern Ireland border question – with the UK making clear it would accept regulatory checks between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The EU has also tried to move checks away from ports and further-in land, or have them done in advance – with both sides expected to come up with concrete proposals after Tory party conference next week.

On the question of what trade agreement could be signed, however, both sides are further apart than ever – with Chequers now a crater, rejected by Remainers, Leaves, and the EU alike, and the prime minister doubling down on it even after its rejection by everyone else.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in