Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit news: Labour MPs demand Corbyn answer claim he cut line about second referendum from letter to May

Labour leader’s office alleged to have agreed the letter should support a fresh referendum, if his compromise was rejected – only to omit the sentence at the last minute

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Monday 11 February 2019 13:53 GMT
Comments
Countdown to Brexit: How many days left until Britain leaves the EU?

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jeremy Corbyn is under pressure over an explosive claim that he broke a pledge to support a new Brexit referendum if Theresa May rejected his compromise plan.

A letter from the Labour leader to the prime minister – setting out five legally binding demands as his price for backing a deal – angered many Labour MPs by making no mention of a fresh public vote.

Now it has been alleged that Mr Corbyn’s office agreed the letter should set out clear support for the referendum, if Ms May turned down his offer, only to omit the sentence at the last minute.

Mr Corbyn’s office declined to comment on the claim, although a Labour source told The Independent the allegation was “false”.

Labour MPs backing a Final Say people’s vote urged Mr Corbyn to come clean about what commitments were given about the contents, before it was sent last Wednesday.

“Time after time, Labour members and supporters demand a people’s vote. Yet time after time, this is thwarted from the top,” said Chris Leslie, Labour MP for Nottingham East.

And Ben Bradshaw, MP for Exeter, said: “If true, any attempt by the leadership, or figures in the leader’s office, to subvert or renege on Labour’s unanimously agreed policy would provoke uproar among our members, voters and MPs.”

The claim has been made by Robert Peston, ITV’s political editor, who said “multiple sources” told him the Labour leader’s office went back on the commitment given to Keir Starmer, the party’s Brexit spokesperson.

Sir Keir had “agreed that the final part of Corbyn’s letter to May would say ‘if you do not accept this [Brexit offer] there will be a people’s vote’,” Mr Peston claimed.

“LOTO [the leader of the opposition] agreed to this. But then Keir discovered after the letter had been sent and published that the people’s vote paragraph had gone.”

Both Sir Keir and Mr Corbyn’s spokesperson declined to comment on the claim concerning the pair’s private discussions.

Mr Corbyn was forced onto the back foot after the letter, and quickly assured Labour MPs and members he was not ruling out a further referendum.

John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, went further – saying Labour wanted a compromise “in the national interest”. He added: “If we can’t do that, well yes, we have to go back to the people.”

Crucially, Downing Street has now firmly rejected the central plank of Mr Corbyn’s compromise plan, namely the UK being part of a permanent customs union.

The prime minister’s spokesperson said: “We are absolutely clear on this – we’re not considering Jeremy Corbyn’s customs proposals.

“We’re not considering any proposals to remain in the customs union. We must have our own independent trade policy.”

David Lammy, another Labour MP supporting a fresh referendum, said the letter showed Labour must now start “campaigning for a people’s vote”.

“We have now entered the emergency zone of these negotiations, and the prime minister has swept Labour’s only other option off the table.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in