Brexit: David Davis indicates UK unlikely to invoke Article 50 at EU summit in early March

The Government is refusing to reveal the exact date it will trigger the EU exit clause

Ashley Cowburn
Political Correspondent
Tuesday 14 February 2017 12:43
Comments
The Brexit Secretary reaffirmed the Government’s commitment to concluding Brexit negotiations in two years
The Brexit Secretary reaffirmed the Government’s commitment to concluding Brexit negotiations in two years

David Davis has indicated the UK is unlikely to trigger Article 50 and kick-start the formal Brexit negotiations at the European Council summit in early March.

The comments from the Brexit Secretary come following reports that Downing Street was preparing to invoke the two-year mechanism for Britain’s exit from the EU during the two-day European Council summit in Malta beginning on 9 March.

When asked at a news conference in Stockholm whether Theresa May intended to serve notice of Article 50 to the 27 other EU leaders at the summit, Mr Davis replied: “The 9th or 10th is not a date I recognise in terms of our timetable. What we have said is by the end of March, sometime during March.”

He added: “I’m confident that we’ll do it before our timetable but not necessarily before the one you played out”.

A Downing Street source supported the Brexit Secretary’s comments.

Ms May has refused to reveal the exact date she intends to invoke Article 50 but has made clear, since the Conservative party conference in October last year, that she will trigger the mechanism before the end of March – her self-imposed deadline.

“We want in two years to come to a conclusion on this matter,” Mr Davis added. “We have said that we may have some implementation things to do after that, but we think in two years both are possible.”

Last week in the Commons, MPs passed the Government’s European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill by an overwhelming majority of 494 votes to 122. It has now passed to the Lords, which will begin debating the bill next week.

On Sunday Labour’s leader in the House of Lords pledged not to hold up or “frustrate” the triggering of Article 50 by attempting to derail the legislation.

Baroness Angela Smith pledged no “extended ping-ping” between the House of Commons and the House of Lords, but said peers would try to add “legitimate” amendments to the bill. Labour’s peers have tabled a number of ideas they say could make the Brexit process run more efficiently, including the call for a meaningful vote on the final deal.

The Government has no majority in the House of Lords meaning that it must rely on the support of neutral peers and those from other parties to clear the way for its legislative programme.

Disagreements between the Lords and the Commons can sometimes lead to long delays in legislation being passed, as bills are sent back and forth between the two houses. The Commons does, ultimately, have the ability to overrule the Lords, though this approach is only used as a last resort.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in