In a new weekly column for The Independent, Mr Umunna said the 27 EU members saw Brexit as a “damage limitation” exercise and did not want to punish the UK, as some Brexiteers claim. “They believe Brexit is bad for them and us,” he wrote. “If, when we see what the Brexit deal actually looks like, we want to change our minds and fight to reform the EU from within, they would be delighted.”
Dismissing claims by some lawyers that the exit process could not be halted, he added: “There is unanimous acceptance that Article 50 is revocable and they would be very very happy for the UK to continue as a member of the club. That is why it makes sense to keep an open mind on what we do at the end of these negotiations.”
Mr Umunna, who met EU government representatives in recent months as co-chair of the all-party Parliamentary Group on EU Relations, revealed that some officials privately describe the Government’s view of the EU’s position as a “fantasy” and a “delusion.”
He warned the UK will not be able to “have its cake and eat it,” saying: “The problem is that most EU governments are not clear what May thinks a bespoke UK arrangement would look like.” He said no diplomat he had spoken to believes it would be possible to strike a trade agreement by the time a two-year transitional period ends in 2021.
One senior EU representative told Mr Umunna the UK lacks “a national position” on how to approach Brexit. He said EU members had noted the “backseat driving” by Brexiteers ministers such as Boris Johnson and Michael Gove as they undermined Ms May by setting out their own “red lines.”
The former Shadow Business Secretary contrasted the Government’s “incoherence” with “the iron discipline” of the EU27 in the talks. He said the Prime Minister’s charm offensive, including one-to-one dinners with EU leaders, in Downing Street has in the main been rebuffed.
However, Ms May and her ministers insist they should “aim high” in the negotiations to forge a “deep and special partnership” with the EU. They argue that the UK can win a much more ambitious trade deal than the EU-Canada agreement because it starts from a position of “full alignment” with EU regulations. They are confident they can ensure that services, including financial services, will be covered by the deal, and believe that differences between EU members will surface when trade talks begin.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies