Brexit deal could leave Northern Ireland in different time zone for six months every year, peers warn

Report criticises ministers’ lax approach to what could be a significant change

Patrick Daly
Tuesday 11 February 2020 08:33
Comments
Brexit briefing: How long until the end of the transition period?

Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal could lead to Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK falling in different time zones for half the year, peers have warned.

The European Parliament voted last year for a proposal to scrap the twice-yearly changing of the clocks to accommodate extra daylight hours.

Under an EU directive, all 27 states currently switch to summer time hours on the last Sunday of March and back to Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) on the last Sunday of October – a pattern the UK follows.

But under a potential swap by Brussels to a “double summer time” arrangement, Lords have warned that the PM’s withdrawal agreement could see Northern Ireland legally obliged to be one hour ahead for six months every year.

It would mean the 1.8 million people living in the six counties would follow summer time hours, even when those in Great Britain wind their clocks back by 60 minutes in the autumn.

The fears over an obligation for Northern Ireland to follow Brussels’ lead if the EU does adopt double-summer time stem from Mr Johnson’s Brexit deal, which signed Northern Ireland up to continuing to follow EU rules on goods and agriculture in order to prevent a hard border.

Any EU-wide shift in timekeeping would apply to Ireland and – due to the terms of the PM’s divorce treaty – Northern Ireland might have to follow suit, peers have suggested.

“Were this proposal [for double summer time] to become EU law under its current single market legal basis, Northern Ireland may be obliged under the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement and the protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland to align with the EU and thus institute a time border with Great Britain,” said the Lords’ EU internal market sub-committee in a report Clock changes: is it time for change?

The group of cross-party peers have called on the government to “give urgent further consideration” to the impact the Brexit agreement could have if the EU does decide to make the summer time switch permanent – and criticised ministers’ lax approach to what could be a significant change for the UK.

“Our inquiry has demonstrated that any such decision at EU level would have implications for the UK, notwithstanding UK withdrawal from the EU,” wrote the peers.

“The nature and significance of such implications is not, however, well understood – not least by the government.”

Baroness Donaghy, chair of the committee, said there was also the possibility that Ireland could face a situation where it has different time zones on either side of the border.

“So far the government has stuck its head in the sand on the EU Commission’s proposal, hoping that it goes away,” she said.

“However, if it does not, we could be caught unaware and unprepared to make a decision, leaving the island of Ireland with two time zones at different times of the year and causing difficulties for people and businesses in Northern Ireland.”

The report, published on Tuesday, praised ministers’ “informal engagement” with counterparts in Northern Ireland on the issue, but pushed for a more detailed review to take place.

Peers recommended reviewing research carried out in countries that have different time zones, and identify the possible implications of time zone changes for both domestic and international businesses.

Business minister Kelly Tolhurst, giving evidence to the committee last year, said: “Anything that would create a time border in Northern Ireland we are completely opposed to, and so is the Irish government.”

The proposal to scrap the biannual time-switch across the continent derived from a citizens’ forum carried out by the EU.

The consultation, undertaken when the UK was still a member, received 4.6 million responses, 84 per cent of which were in favour of abolishing the clock change practise.

But peers noted that the respondents accounted for less than 1 per cent of the EU population, and 70 per cent of those responses came from Germany alone.

Press Association

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in