Britain could drift towards a police state, says one of Britain’s top police officers

'Securocrats' should not decide the definition of extremism, says Sir Peter Fahy

Jon Stone
Saturday 06 December 2014 18:03
Comments
Sir Peter Fahy
Sir Peter Fahy

One of Britain’s most senior police officers has said the country is in danger of a “drift towards a police state”.

Sir Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, told the Guardian newspaper that under the UK’s current trajectory officers might be forced to adopt the role of “thought police” in the fight against extremism.

He called for government and civil society to have a discussion about where the line between free speech and extremism should be set, arguing that it was not the security services’ job to define such limits.

Sir Peter stressed that he supported new counter-terrorism measures announced by the Government last week, however.

“If these issues [defining extremism] are left to securocrats then there is a danger of a drift to a police state,” he told the newspaper.

“I am a securocrat, it’s people like me, in the security services, people with a narrow responsibility for counter-terrorism. It is better for that to be defined by wider society and not securocrats.

“There is a danger of us being turned into a thought police. This securocrat says we do not want to be in the space of policing thought or police defining what is extremism.”

Greater Manchester Police is the third largest police force in the country after the London Metropolitan Police and Police Scotland.

Sir Peter holds a number of counter-terrorism positions, including vice chair of the Association of Chief Police Officers Terrorism and Allied Matters section, and a lead on the Prevent counter-extremism strategy.

Last month the Government outlined new powers and laws that it said would help fight terrorism, including plans to restrict ‘extremist’ speakers at universities and powers to relocate people suspected of terror offences.

Civil liberties groups branded the power-grab a “chilling recipe for injustice” and accused ministers of an attack on civil soviety.

“Yet again politicians resort to rushed legislation in an attempt to look tough in the face of terrorism,” said Shami Chakrabarti, the director of the rights group Liberty.

“Even our universities must read from ministers’ scripts on radicalisation. Another chilling recipe for injustice and resentment by closing down the open society you seek to promote.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in