Cameron: 'Broken' companies could be banned from bidding for government contracts

 

G4S security at the 2012 Games
G4S security at the 2012 Games

Companies with 'broken' cultures could be blocked from bidding for Government contracts, David Cameron has indicated following scandals involving contractors G4S and Serco.

The Prime Minister was urged to set up a 'high risk register' for firms which had failed to deliver on public contracts in the past.

He told senior MPs on the Liaison Committee that the Government was considering whether firms should be struck off other contracts following failures.

The contracts for tagging criminals resulted in security giants Serco and G4S overcharging the Government by tens of millions of pounds - including for monitoring dead offenders.

G4S also botched the Olympics security contract and the Government uncovered potentially fraudulent behaviour in Serco's management of its £285 million prison escorting contract.

Home Affairs Select Committee chairman Keith Vaz used the example of G4S as he raised the possibility of a register of 'high risk' firms.

He asked: "Should we have a high-risk register, as the Home Affairs Select Committee recommended, where companies that have failed so spectacularly should be put on that register and not be allowed to bid for Government contracts?"

Cameron replied: "When there is a serious breach, as there has been for instance on tagging, then you need proper investigation. If the investigation finds that the culture of those companies is broken in some way, then you might need to strike them off other Government contracts. That is currently being considered."

Justice Select Committee chairman Sir Alan Beith said: "Serious irregularities were discovered in the tagging contracts, the prisoner escort contracts. These involved G4S and Serco.

"The Justice Secretary said he found the situation that had arisen in electronic monitoring contracts to be wholly indefensible and unacceptable.

"Of course, the whole process of privatising some prisons had to be stopped because some of the contractors were involved in the other issues."

Cameron told him: "Clearly the contract of tagging, this is not acceptable. That's why there's proper investigation taking place."

But he stressed that the process of contracting out public services had been of great benefit.

He said: "I think it would be wrong to assume that contractorisation, competitive tendering can't work. It's been a huge success story if you think of the money saved and the better services in many cases.

"There are things where it's gone wrong and we need to examine them."

PA

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in