Government votes down bid to help child refugees be reunited with family

‘Disappointed’ Lord Dubs says further attempt may be made to offer help to underage migrants

Andrew Woodcock
Political Editor
Wednesday 04 November 2020 19:27
Comments
A Border Force patrol with migrants from a small boat in the English Channel
A Border Force patrol with migrants from a small boat in the English Channel

The government has for a second time voted down efforts to preserve family reunion rights for child refugees after the UK’s transition out of the EU’s immigration rules on 31 December.

The proposal, put forward by Labour peer Lord Dubs has twice been approved by the House of Lords but twice rejected by the Commons - this time by a margin of 333 votes to 264.

Lord Dubs - himself a Kindertransport child refugee from the Nazis - told The Independent the defeat was “very disappointing” but said a further attempt may be made to offer assistance to child migrants when the bill returns to the upper House.

“It’s going to come back to the House of Lords and we will have to see what we can do,” he said. “It is under discussion as we speak.”

He welcomed “powerful” speeches from a succession of MPs who backed his amendment to home secretary Priti Patel’s Immigration Bill against what he said was “not much of an argument” offered by ministers.

In a debate taking place just a week after the death of two Iranian children and their parents on a small boat in the English Channel, immigration minister Kevin Foster told MPs that the government was conducting a review of safe routes for refugees to the UK.

Child refugees’ automatic right to be reunited with family in the UK will lapse with the transition to post-Brexit relations with the EU at the end of the year.

“It’s important we consider these routes to discourage vulnerable children from making the dangerous and illegal journeys that can result in the kind of tragedy we saw last week,” said Mr Foster.

But Labour’s shadow Home Office minister Holly Lynch said permitting family reunion and accepting unaccompanied minors “should not be politically contentious”.


She told the Commons: “We are a decent and humanitarian country who take seriously their enshrined requirement under international law to consider asylum claims and to offer refuge to those fleeing persecution and destitution.”


Conservative former minister Tim Loughton said he found it “extraordinary” that the government continued to resist Lord Dubs’ proposals.


Mr Loughton said: “With just eight weeks to go before effectively the Dublin arrangements for family reunion fall, we’ve had the tragic drownings in the Channel just recently.

"Mercifully, but surprisingly, those cases are rare.
 There are many people in this House who feel we must do better and for the sake of about 500 highly vulnerable children, I just find it extraordinary that the government is still sticking its heels in.”

Only three Conservative MPs - Mr Loughton, Sir David Amess and Jason McCartney - backed the Dubs amendment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in