Boris Johnson admits failure to replace Grenfell-style cladding is 'disgraceful'

Watchdogs have previously criticised government delays on making buildings safe

Jon Stone
Policy Correspondent
Wednesday 23 September 2020 13:20
Comments
Buildings have been fitted with flammable cladding which needs replacing
Buildings have been fitted with flammable cladding which needs replacing

The failure to replace dangerous Grenfell-style cladding three years after the tragedy is "disgraceful", Boris Johnson has admitted.

The prime minister was asked during prime minister's questions on Wednesday what steps the government was taking to replace unsafe cladding on high-rise buildings, following as series of delays and criticism by watchdogs.

Ministers promised over a year ago that it would fund the replacement of cladding on high-rise private residential buildings, but many residents are still waiting for action.

Labour MP for Vauxhall Florence Eshalomi said the delay was leading hundreds of leaseholders across her consistencies "unable to sell or remortgage their properties".

The prime mister replied: "I am aware of this problem of people facing real disadvantage, leaseholders and others, because of the unsafe cladding  still on their buildings.

"I think it is disgraceful, and both ACM and HPL cladding should, in my view, come off as fast as possible and we are investing massively to achieve that as fast we can. I sincerely appreciate the problem that she raises."

In May 2019 the government said it would provide £200 million funding to speed up cladding replacement hundreds of millions of pounds for for 170 privately-owned towers.

But rules for a further £1 billion cladding replacement fund unveiled in May this year excluded a number of buildings with combustible cladding that were previously assumed to be covered.

In some cases, leaseholders are known to have taken out loans worth tens of thousands of pounds to make their buildings safe in advance of assumed government cash.

The National Audit Office warned in June that the government was falling well behind on its promise to replace dangerous cladding. 

The watchdog warned that “the pace of progress has lagged behind [the government’s] own expectations, particularly in the private residential sector”. It added that the government “It has a long way to go to make all high-rise buildings safe for residents.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in