Clegg wants Budget to target the rich

Lib Dems call for rich to pay mansion tax.

Andrew Grice
Monday 16 January 2012 01:00
Comments
Nick Clegg is demanding a 'tax the rich' Budget in March
Nick Clegg is demanding a 'tax the rich' Budget in March

Nick Clegg is demanding a "tax the rich" Budget in March to head off growing fears that the Coalition will lose public support because its deficit-reduction programme is seen as unfair on ordinary families.

The Liberal Democrats are urging George Osborne to include a mansion tax on homes worth £2m and measures to stop the rich avoiding stamp duty when they sell their properties by transferring ownership to a shell company.

Although it is thought the Chancellor is unlikely to introduce a high-value property tax immediately, he may set up a review to look at raising the tax burden on the rich by targeting property assets rather than income, which would be harder to avoid. Mr Osborne is likely to act on stamp duty, amid evidence that rich people reduce the 5 per cent stamp duty on the sale of homes worth £1m to only 0.5 per cent by placing their property in a company.

Mr Clegg and other Liberal Democrat cabinet ministers will make their demands in behind-the-scenes talks with Mr Osborne before his Budget on 21 March. Other Liberal Democrat proposals include a tax on land values and scrapping the 40 per cent tax relief on pension contributions for higher-rate taxpayers. They also want a new crackdown on "non-domiciles" – foreign residents living in Britain who do not pay tax on their overseas earnings.

Today, Mr Clegg will join the debate about "responsible capitalism" before a speech on "moral markets" by David Cameron later this week. The Deputy Prime Minister will call for millions of workers to own shares in their companies in a new "John Lewis economy".

A source close to Mr Clegg said: "Nick is pushing his government colleagues for real, early, radical action on this. Employee ownership is part of a long liberal tradition."

Senior Liberal Democrats are worried public support for spending cuts could melt away unless the rich shoulder more of the burden.

Higher taxes for the rich are popular with the public and the Liberal Democrats do not want to be defined in the year ahead by their pro-European stance, which is not supported by a majority of voters. They believe the Tories might be persuaded to act on property values because opinion polls suggest they are seen by many voters as "a party for the rich" rather than "people like us." To increase the pressure on Mr Osborne, some Liberal Democrats plan to join Labour to try to bring in a mansion tax if it is not included in the Budget.

Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay, a Liberal Democrat peer and close ally of the Business Secretary, Vince Cable, said: "A mansion tax is the real test of whether the Coalition means business on fair taxation. You can't claim 'we are all in it together' when wealth is virtually untaxed."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in