Coronavirus: Senior civil servant backtracks on claim UK’s failure to join EU ventilator scheme was ‘political decision’

Sir Simon McDonald initially contradicted No 10, saying ministers were briefed on ‘what was on offer’ to UK

Ashley Cowburn
Political Correspondent
Tuesday 21 April 2020 17:51
Comments
UK's failure to join EU ventilator scheme was 'political decision', not communication error, says senior civil servant

The most senior civil servant at the Foreign Office has backtracked on his claim that the UK’s failure to participate in the EU’s procurement scheme for medical kit and ventilators was a “political decision”.

Sir Simon McDonald, the permanent under secretary at the department, initially told MPs that ministers had been briefed by the UK’s mission to the EU on “what was on offer” from Brussels – promoting outrage from opposition parties.

His comments directly contradicted previous government statements on the issue, after No 10 blamed the decision not to participate in the emergency scheme to provide gowns, ventilators and other medical equipment, on a “communication problem” in March.

But hours later – in a letter published by the foreign affairs select committee – Sir Simon said: “Unfortunately, due to a misunderstanding, I inadvertently and wrongly told the committee, that ministers were briefed by UKMIS on the EU’s joint procurement scheme and took a political decision not to participate in it.

He added: “This is incorrect. Ministers were not briefed by our mission in Brussels about the scheme and a political decision was not taken on whether or not to participate.

“The facts of the situation are as previously set out. Owing to an initial communications problem, the UK did not receive an invitation in time to join in four joint Covid EU procurement schemes. As those four initial schemes had already gone out to tender we were unable to take part.”

Stewart McDonald, an SNP MP who sits on the foreign affairs committee, however, said: “I’m afraid [Sir Simon’s] letter of clarification to [committee] fails to meet its objective – in fact it raises more questions than it answers. This has longer to run.”

During the session in Westminster on Tuesday afternoon, the Labour MP Chris Bryant asked Sir Simon why the UK had not taken part in the scheme which aims to provide member states with crucial medical equipment to fight covid-19 in the coming weeks.

The senior civil servant said it was a “political decision”, adding that the government’s representation in Brussel’s had “briefed ministers about what was available, what was on offer and the decision is known”.

Speaking after Sir Simon’s appearance at the foreign affair’s committee, Matt Hancock, the health secretary, told the Downing Street press conference: “As far as I’m aware there was no political decision not to participate in that scheme.”

He added: “When we did receive an invitation in the Department for Health it was put up to me to be ask and we joined, so we are now members of that scheme. But as far as I know that scheme has not yet produced a single item of PPE.”

It comes after the government was widely criticised for failing to join the scheme last month when infections of coronavirus were on the rise in the UK, and at the time a government spokesperson said: “Owing to an initial communication problem, the UK did not receive an invitation in time to join in four joint procurements in response to the coronavirus pandemic.”

Downing Street had claimed there had been a “mix up” which meant emails from the EU about the procurement scheme were not received and would “consider participating in future procurement schemes”.

The lack of British involvement in the schemes led to claims that it was motivated by Brexiteer ideology in Mr Johnson’s administration – a claim denied by Downing Street.

Naomi Smith, of pro-EU campaign Best for Britain, said: “If it was a political decision not to join Europe-wide schemes to bulk-buy PPE and other essential medical equipment, then the government prioritised its own image over the country’s health.

“That decision has been disastrous. Frontline workers deserve much better. We urge the government to seek participation in future schemes as soon as possible, so we can source the medical supplies Britain’s hospitals and care homes desperately need.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in