David Cameron 'should not be discriminated against for being rich', says Conservative MP

Mark Pritchard accuses the Labour party of trying to distract attention away from its internal strife

Caroline Mortimer
Friday 08 April 2016 16:46
Comments
The latest reversal has seen David Cameron shelve the Government's plans to force all schools to become academies, a move described as a 'humiliating climb-down'
The latest reversal has seen David Cameron shelve the Government's plans to force all schools to become academies, a move described as a 'humiliating climb-down'

David Cameron must not be discriminated against for "being born into a wealthy family", a Conservative backbencher has said.

Mark Pritchard, the Tory MP for the Wrekin, came to the defence of the Prime Minister following Mr Cameron's admission that he did personally benefit from an offshore investment fund set up by his father.

Mr Pritchard accused the Labour party of trying to distract attention from their party’s internal strife by attacking Mr Cameron who he said was the victim of “real injustice”.

Several senior Labour figures, including former Mayor of London Ken Livingstone and MP John Mann, have called for Mr Cameron to resign after he admitted that he earned £30,000 from the sale of his shares in the fund, Blairmore Holdings, in 2010.

In an interview with ITV News, he admitted to making the sale shortly before becoming prime minister but he did so in accordance with UK tax rules.

Since the existence of the investment fund came to light early this week – following the leak of 11.5 million documents from Panama law firm Mossack Fonseca – Mr Cameron had repeatedly avoided answering questions about whether he had benefited from an offshore trust in the past. He eventually admitted he had on Thursday.

Mr Pritchard told BBC News he thought "most of the public will find it distasteful" that Mr Cameron's father has been brought into a political row.

“I think it’s very unseemly, very distasteful and I think there’s a real injustice," he said.

“I don’t know all the details, but I think there’s a principle at stake here: it’s about justice and it’s an injustice that the Prime Minister’s late father, who did the best for his family, a loving father, a loving son, is not here to defend himself.

“The Prime Minister has said that he will publish his tax returns. He’s been very, very open about his property ownership, his other ownership. I don’t think he should be discriminated against just because he was born into a wealthy family.”

He also accused the politicians who have criticised Mr Cameron of hypocrisy, saying members of the Shadow Cabinet should “come clean about some of their possible offshore activities”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in