The public overwhelmingly think planned PIP disability benefit cuts are wrong, polls find

The Chancellor unveiled plans to take an average of £3,500 a year from 370,000 disabled people

Jon Stone
Friday 18 March 2016 13:36
Comments
The Chancellor George Osborne
The Chancellor George Osborne

There is overwhelming public opposition to the disability benefit cuts put forward by George Osborne in the Budget, a series of polls has revealed.

Cuts to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) confirmed by the Chancellor yesterday will raise £4.4 billion by 2020, by stripping people who use specially adapted appliances of payments.

The cuts would see 370,000 disabled people lose an average of £3,500 a year, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

A poll by YouGov following the Budget found that 70 per cent of the general public believe the policy is “the wrong priority”, with just 13 per cent saying it is a “good idea”

A separate poll conducted by Populus for the learning disability charity Mencap found only 7 per cent of people think the cuts will make society more equal, with 61 per cent believing it will become less equal.

Previous polling released by the charity found that 71 per cent believe the cuts will make Britain a worse place to be disabled.

The latest PIP cut comes hot-on-the hells of at £30-a-week reduction in payments to disabled people in the so-called “work related activity group” of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), passed by MPs this month.

The backlash against the cuts comes despite previously solid public support for welfare reductions in general.

Against this public opinion backdrop, the Conservatives pledged to make £12 billion welfare cuts at the general election – with the largest single reduction in Wednesday’s spending statement coming from the disabled.

Some backbench Conservative MPs have said they are nervous about the cut, with Cabinet minister Nicky Morgan last night suggesting they were not final and merely a “suggestion” that was “under consultation”.

The Department for Work and Pensions has however already completed its consultation on the changes and a source close to Iain Duncan Smith told the BBC this morning that any suggestion of a U-turn do not “tally with what we and Downing Street are saying”.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said the Government had “declared war on the disabled”.

Iain Duncan Smith's department, the DWP, has proposed the cuts

The Government has drawn particular criticism because the savings from the cuts produce as much money as George Osborne allocated for tax cuts for wealthier people.

A coalition of 25 disability charities wrote to the DWP on the day the consultation was released arguing that the cuts would have a “severe impact” on people’s security and make it harder for them to find work.

Disabilities minister Justin Tomlinson said at the announcement of the cuts that they would make PIP work better.

“The introduction of Personal Independence Payment to replace the outdated Disability Living Allowance for working age claimants has been a hugely positive reform,” he said.

“But it is clear that the assessment criteria for aids and appliances are not working as planned. Many people are eligible for a weekly award despite having minimal to no extra costs and judicial decisions have expanded the criteria for aids and appliances to include items we would expect people to have in their homes already.

“We consulted widely to find the best approach. And this new change will ensure that PIP is fairer and targets support at those who need it most.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in